15 Dec 2005
The struggle in the State of Massachusetts over which document format to use internally should not be about the Open Document Format (ODF) versus Microsoft's Open XML, Sun Microsystems' chief open source officer Simon Phipps said at a meeting with reporters in San Francisco.
Instead it should be about moving to a new generation of file format to ensure that societies, companies and individuals have access to their data in the future.
"We will continue to have this problem with drifting file formats and the loss of society's memory. It will continue to be a problem until there is a multi-lateral baseline file format," said Phipps.
Users of older versions of Microsoft Office cannot currently open documents created in the latest version of the application. Similarly, the current version in some cases will have trouble accessing documents crafted in older version of the productivity suite.
Phipps described the latter as "corporate Alzheimer's" which will be a major concern for enterprises, governments and especially archives that often find it impossible to access data that is over 10 years old.
As a solution technology companies need to create a "baseline" general standard for office documents which can be used by any software suite, thereby preventing vendor lock-in.
The ODF has been designed with these goals in mind. In addition to Sun, the standard counts Adobe and IBM among its backers. The format is being used in the OpenOffice productivity suite and several derived products including Sun's Star Office.
Looking for a standard that can withstand time, Massachusetts said that from 1 January 2007 it would mandate the use of products based on ODF's specifications at the offices of the executive branch.
Massachusetts is the first government entity to come out in support of ODF. Many other government departments are believed to be closely watching the initiative as they prepare to follow the state's lead.
This has turned Massachusetts into a key battleground over the future of document standards and has led to accusations against its chief information officer concerning alleged corruption in attending open source conferences.
Microsoft plans to use the Open XML format in the next version of Office. The file format has been submitted for approval with the ECMA standards body. Approval of the standard there would open up the Microsoft format.
ECMA is considered to be one of the more liberal standards bodies, however, allowing Microsoft to keep firm control over the standard.
Sun also criticized the ECMA approval process and membership criteria, which effectively locks out individual open source proponents who are not affiliated with any organisation.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
This role is in the busy technology department within...
We are looking for a Sage Technical Support specialist...
EMEA Cash Equity/Futures Support Manager, Top Tier Bank...
Senior Java Analyst/Developer Skill set: Java, J2SE...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Smear campaign not corruption
The alleged allegations were due to a smear campaign fronted through the Boston Globe. The whole accusation could have been averted if the boston globe editors had been bothered to try contacting Quinn's supervisor. This bizarre chain of events from the newspaper cause us to ask the following: 1. Did Mr. Kurkjian decide to look into Mr. Quinn's travel on his own, or was this suggested to him by someone? 2. If there was a source, who was that source? 3. If there was a source, was that source inside the Massachusetts government or outside? 4. If the source was inside the government, were the disclosures made to Mr. Kurkjian made in violation of any State policy? 5. If the source was outside the government, did the source have any affiliations that would lead him or her to have an interest in the disparagement of Mr. Quinn? 6. Why did Mr. Kurkjian not wait to run the story until he was able to reach Mr. Kriss, who Mr. Kurkjian knew could confirm or disprove the basis for the story? 7. Was this story, and the investigation behind it, in compliance with the Globe's policies?
Posted by: Olav 15 Dec 2005