22 Aug 2005
A team of European researchers has demonstrated for the first time that it is possible to control the speed of light. The scientists, from the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), has successfully slowed light down and speeded it up within an optical fibre, using off-the-shelf instrumentation in normal environmental conditions.
The breakthrough is predicted to have commercial applications in a variety of areas including optical computing and fibre-optic telecommunications.
Luc Thévenaz and his fellow researchers in the Nanophotonics and Metrology laboratory at EPFL said they were able not only to slow light down by a factor of three from its usual speed of 300 million metres per second in a vacuum, but they have also accomplished the considerable feat of speeding it up – effectively making light go faster than the speed of light.
The experiments are not the first time that scientists have tweaked the speed of a light signal. Even light passing through a window or water is slowed down a fraction as it travels through the medium. In fact, in the right conditions, scientists have been able to slow light down to the speed of a bicycle, or even stop it altogether. In 2003, a group from the University of Rochester made an important advance by slowing down a light signal in a room-temperature solid.
But all these methods depend on special media such as cold gases or crystalline solids, and they only work at certain well-defined wavelengths. With the publication of their method, the EPFL team, made up of Luc Thévenaz, Miguel Gonzaléz Herraez and Kwang-Yong Song, has demonstrated the first all-optical technique to slow light in off-the-shelf optical fibres.
"This has the enormous advantage of being a simple, inexpensive procedure that works at any wavelength, notably at wavelengths used in telecommunications, " explains Thévenaz.
The telecommunications industry transmits vast quantities of data via fibre optics with light signals travelling at about 186,000 miles per second. But information cannot be processed at this speed, because with current technology light signals cannot be stored, routed or processed without first being transformed into electrical signals, which work much more slowly.
Thévenaz notes that, if the light signal could be controlled by light, it would be possible to route and process optical data without the costly electrical conversion, opening up the possibility of processing information at the speed of light.
The EPFL team’s stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) method can slow a light signal down by a factor of 3.6, creating a sort of temporary 'optical memory'. The researchers were also able to create extreme conditions in which the light signal travelled faster than 300 million meters a second.
Slowing down light is considered to be a critical step in our ability to process information optically. The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) considers it so important that it has been funnelling millions of dollars into projects such as applications of slow light in optical fibres and research on all-optical routers. To succeed commercially, a device that slows down light must be able to work across a range of wavelengths, be capable of working at high bit-rates and be reasonably compact and inexpensive.
Latest stories from Networks
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Position: Infrastructure Technical Lead Experience...
Channel Manager / Sales Manager /Software solutions...
BUSINESS SALES / IT SALES / BUSINESS CONSULTANT / LONDON...
TECHNICAL SALES / ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE / SOFTWARE SALES...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Hmmmmmm
Well it COULD be the maxium speed of light is more than 3 million and due to collisions/refraction even in a vaccuum, it doesnt travel at full speed. If so, all this is, is reducing the slow down rate. Honestly, I dont know... and sorta half asleep
Posted by: Anon 03 May 2008
WTF?
This idea of increasing the speed of light would be easier to swallow if there was any scientific fact and research results presented with the article. Until I see those, I will remain skeptical
Posted by: sg 02 Sep 2005
Please keep an open mind
Science is a fluid subject and the boundaries are constantly being broken. New barriers are usually formed by our limited understanding, not by nature itself. I'm always amazed by the near dogmatic reaction of some people to this topic: "I'm not a physicist, but Einstein said that....". And so what?! That's not science!! That's fundamentalism, religious and ugly!! Einstein was a genius, but he was not the first and surely won't be the last. The limitations of his understanding provided the limitations of his theories, and just because the average joe may have issues trying to catch up with such thinking, his limitations can't be applied to the universe!! Some recent physicists have brought into question some of the great man's ideas, and as our understanding increases, many more questions will be asked and answered. And that's always a good thing. Quantum Physics has made some Newtonian concepts appear rather basic and limited in comparison. But how did Quantum Physics and its offspring become established without the full use of the enquiring mind, challenging the status quo, daring to think the unthinkable? Who knows where the next step will take us. In order to take those next steps though, we need to keep an open mind. The truth will eventually come to light (excuse the pun!).
Posted by: Uche Eke 31 Aug 2005
How little we know!
Once upon a time you would have almost have been burned at the stake for heresey at the mere sugestion that the Earth was not at the centre of the universe(or what was understood as the universe, just ask Mr Newton!), and even to hint at the fact that the Earth may not be flat would induce instant ridicule. There are even people alive today that believe the fairy tale stories of Adam and Eve et al. It was once said that humanity knows/understands less than 1% of 1% of 1% of everything that there is to know in th cosmos(personaly, i believe this quote is extremely generous!) We are still in a VERY primative stage of evolution, even though our frontal cortex's and our science would have us believe that we have reached the pinnacle of our achivments. This has led us to a false sense belief that we know, almost, everything(Take the Hubble Space Telescope for example, it continues to prove us wrong on a weekly basis and generates even more questions!). We are merely at the 'toddler' level in our development but, dangerously, believe we are at the 'mature adult' stage with the ability to understand almost everything, including the nature of God(boy, are we in for a shock). I have no doubt that in several millions of years down the evolutionary line we may well understand and have control over science that today is considered 'sci-fi' i.e time travel(which is simply another branch physics we do not, as yet, understand), the U.F.O phenomenom and anything else that is considered the subjects of fiction fuelled by conspiricy fans. So, the essence of this letter is that the discovery that light can be de/accelerated at will, is on par with a child discovering that fitting an extra gear on his bike will make him go faster. Obvious to us, but a significant advancement to the child. We live on tiny insingnificant rock floating within an insignificant galaxy in an obscure corner of the universe which 'floats' in an eternal void(are our minds evolved enough yet to truly understand the implications of eternity?). The Universe is our classroom so let's learn. It's what our teacher intended us to do! It's time to leave religion behind, it has hindered human development for thousands of years. Science is the new God and will reward us with things we could not even begin to imagine.(Don't worry any religious orientated readers of this comment, there IS an afterlife and a God, just not in the way you have been brainwashed to believe(sorry to sound harsh, but the truth always hurts)). You will understand one day. Take care world, but never stop exploring!
Posted by: Terry Mcphail 26 Aug 2005
Commnicating at faster than the speed of light?
I remember learning at school that the speed of light is a universal constant, hence the letter c. We have known for a long time that this is not infact the case, the refractive index of a material is a calculation dependant on the speed of light in that material. If light can be made to go faster than in a vacuum, the possibility of "faster than light" communication could become a reality. Physisits will not like that!
Posted by: Michael Merryweather 25 Aug 2005
Speeding up light
The article refers to the speed of light in an optical fibre. This means the speed of light in glass, which is closer to 2.10^8 than 3.10^8. Furthermore the speed of light in various media travels at different speeds depending on the exact wavelength of the light. So it is possible to speed up light by, for example, changing the wavelength that travels through the fibre. You can look at the original article on: http://www.opticsexpress.org
Posted by: Ronelle Geldenhuys 24 Aug 2005
Possible to go faster than the speed of light
It is possible to go faster than the speed of light. Whilst it may be the fastest thing known to man, it doesn't necessarily mean nothing can go faster.
Posted by: Jake 24 Aug 2005
Yes indeed. Bunch of poorly verified derriere
Not possible to speed light up beyond its maximum in this universe at the constants available to this universe. Even simple e=mc2 should point out you would need an increasingly infinite amount of energy to speed it up to even CLOSE to its theoretical max speed. Well researched and explained article.. ;)
Posted by: Alex Millar 24 Aug 2005
hmm
it would require infinite energy for any object to go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, but for light itself to travel faster than the supposed limit? It appears in the article that they changed the conditions in which the light travelled instead of increasing the velocity of light directly.
Posted by: or i could be completely wrong... 23 Aug 2005
Faster than light and about time!
I thought I was the only one to think that there is something faster than light. Light as far as I see it, is the fastest thing we have been able to observe thus far. That doesn?t mean that is the limit. What is known about Physics today is only our perception of it. As time goes on, we will learn more about everything, including time itself. I do not believe that time will be a medium through which we can now, or ever travel. I think it boils down to the fact that you are at a point in space where you exist, viewing it from anywhere else is only looking at a memory that time captures for us, a bit like looking at stars. Most of which emitted their light before the Earth was created.
Posted by: Les Pilkington 23 Aug 2005
Faster than light?
I think not. I might not be a physicist but even I know that the speed of light is the maximum so the phrase "effectively making light go faster than the speed of light" is absolute hokkum. I'm sure an appropriately trained physicist could give some explanation as to which nothing can go faster than light (sure it's something to do with requiring infinite energy or mass)
Posted by: Mark Curtis 22 Aug 2005