18 Aug 2006
Microsoft has released patches for its forthcoming Windows Vista operating system, which is currently in beta.
The two patches are necessary because Vista is subject to the same security holes addressed in other Microsoft products during the huge patch delivered on 8 August.
The patches fix critical vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer and the Windows kernel as detailed in Microsoft Security Bulletins MS06-042 and MS06-051.
Security patches are not normally issued for beta software, because no one is supposed to be using it in a critical environment. But Microsoft has issued patches for Vista before.
The patch, rated 'critical', covered a similar WMF flaw that hit the company's other operating systems a week earlier.
The vulnerability was in the Graphics Rendering Engine and could allow an attacker to gain control of a target machine.
Some commentators have suggested that Microsoft has issued the patches to pre-empt security software companies creating 'we've found a hole in Vista' stories.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client is a well established, non profit organisation;...
PHP Web Developer – £30,000 - £35,000 PHP, MySQL, HTML...
HEAD OF DIGITAL - London - £80-95K + Excellent Bens...
Agile C# Developer - (North London) £55,000 - £65,000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Patching "NEW" software ?
I remember reading that Vista was being written fresh , with security as a focus. Now I see that they are patching it already. Makes you wonder how "fresh" the software will really be. Just another reason to add to the "Why should I bother upgrading" list.
Posted by: Glen 24 Aug 2006