02 Aug 2007
ID thieves are increasingly targeting US individuals living in rural communities, new research warns.
According to a new study by risk management firm ID Analytics, US identity fraud hot spots include the cities of Springfield, Illinois; and Bozeman and Missoula, Montana.
In fact, Montana makes multiple appearances in the top ten list: at number four with Whitefish, five with Lolo, seven with Hamilton and eight with Bigfork. Bismark, North Dakota takes the number six slot, with Grand Forks and Fargo, also both in North Dakota, taking the ninth and tenth positions.
The US counties that emerged as hot spots in the last year include 13 counties in North Dakota and seven counties in Montana. The research also showed that in general identity fraud rates are increasing in the upper Midwest, Northern California, Utah, Nevada and Maine. Identity fraud rates appear to be decreasing in the Southern U.S. and staying consistent in such areas as Southern California, the Mexican border of Texas and in cities like Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon.
"These findings may seem surprising because none of these emerging hot spots are high population density areas, and some are even rural," said Stephen Coggeshall, ID Analytics' chief technology officer and the author of the research.
"Our methodology allowed us to compare fraud rates across areas with differing populations to see where fraud is rising most quickly on a per capita basis. While identity fraud rates remain high in many large metropolitan areas like New York, Los Angeles and Detroit, we are seeing substantial emergence of these crimes in more rural areas like Montana and South Dakota.
"This may indicate a trend toward popularisation of this crime, as well as point out that perpetrators are discovering that they can act under the radar in these remote rural areas."
The research, which is based on actual and attempted frauds rather than on consumer victim reports, examined data from January through December 2006.
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Inside Sales / IT Sales / Business Development / Fluent...
Title: Senior Web Developer / Engineer (HTML, JavaScript...
Job Title: Java Developer (J2SE / JEE) Salary: up to...
Job Title: Agile Test Manager Salary: up to 55k per...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
It has to do with U.S. Postal Service mailboxes
The identity theft is created in these locales by criminals stealing mail, real mail out of rural mailboxes. The prior comments about sophisticated electronic widgets would be of no use.
Posted by: Wilbur 13 Aug 2007
Using a CAT is a possible solution
What is needed is a true easy to deploy and free for the masses solution that will make it impossible for ID thefts. The Cellular Authentication Token (CAT) technology is what I have in mind. Since it does not use SMS and it is free as a download from the Internet, it is most suitable for rural and remote places. It can be used by any service provider - for example - banks or credit cards - to verify the identity of the person and being a TFA OTP Strong Authentication, it will prevent ID thefts.
Posted by: Ronit 02 Aug 2007
But will people use it?
We have CAT, SiteKey, SMS and other kinds of authenticators, but nothing is "the answer" as long as people won't use the tools that are avaiilable. Using secure bookmarks will prevent getting phished, but just try to get the security industry to even recommend it. CAT has a number of limitations: how many people have cell phones with Java MIDP CLDC enabled? Obviously such phones are more expensive than phones that just use SMS and make phone calls. So CAT is far from free.
Posted by: Howie Mirkin 02 Aug 2007