17 Jan 2011

Governments hoping to secure their online infrastructure may need to take a new approach to cyber security, say experts.
A recent report from the London School of Economics and Oxford University found that governments may take the wrong approach in viewing an online attack as they would a real-world military action.
"We don't help ourselves using 'cyber war' to describe espionage or hacktivist blockading or defacing of web sites, as recently seen in reaction to WikiLeaks," said London School of Economics professor Peter Sommer.
"Nor is it helpful to group trivially avoidable incidents like routine viruses and frauds with determined attempts to disrupt critical national infrastructure."
Attacks on government sites and IT infrastructure have become more common in recent years, and the US and EU have run drills to simulate the response to a large-scale cyber attack.
Sommer told V3.co.uk that rather than look to trace down and react to incidents, governments should work with private companies to secure systems and prepare plans for possible scenarios.
"Most of the time you will lack certainty about who is attacking you because large numbers of attack methods involve hijacking innocent machines as the vector, making tracing difficult," he said.
"As a result you need to concentrate on making vulnerable systems resilient. That means both protective measures but also fully worked out contingency plans so that you know how to recover quickly."
Graeme Matthews, cyber security partner at global consultancy Deloitte, argued that for critical national infrastructure organisations, there can be a tension between the wishes of the shareholders and the needs of wider society when it comes to shelling out for cyber defences.
"In the current climate of austerity, there could be challenges in agreement about who is going to fund many of the necessary preventative measures," he added.
"Organisations need to be prepared and to have specific contingency plans in place to deal with systems and internet service disruption. Today, not many do and we would urge more positive action in this area."
Latest stories from Government
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
You misanderstood ...
They never told that the chance of cyber-war is low. They just said that there is a misusing of the term cyber-war and that governement are taking cyber-incident carrefully. But they agree on the fact that such event already occur in the past (just think about Estonia and Georgia) and that governement are preparing themself for such futur event.
Posted by: X 13 Jan 2011
Cyber attacks, military perspectives... what cyberwar?
As likely as a visit from E.T.? Is the idea of an upcoming cyberwar just nonsense? Or does the attention given to the topic only distract us from the 'bigger issues'? Instead of gambling on a future of electronic warfare, should we continue to develop conventional defense technologies? More on this discussion available here also... http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/133-cavelty/134-cyberwar-and-cyberfear
Posted by: Angelina Doherty 13 Jan 2011
A coordinate attack.
I don't believe that such attack happens without an attack in a real world. I mean if this scenario come to an existence will be a coordinated one, normal warfare combine with cyber attack. Like first compromise the telecommunications using the cyber space and then a traditional strike right after.
Posted by: Emerson 13 Jan 2011