31 Jul 2007
Some laser printers release tiny particles of toner-like material into the air that people can inhale deep into their lungs where they may pose a health hazard, scientists have warned.
Lidia Morawska, PhD, and colleagues in Australia classified 17 out of 62 printers in a recent study as “high particle emitters” because they released relatively high quantities of particles, which the researchers believe to be toner.
"One of the printers released particles into an experimental chamber at a rate comparable to the particle emissions from cigarette smoking," the researchers stated.
Thirty-seven of the 62 printers, on the other hand, released no particles that diminished air quality. Six released only low levels, and two medium levels. All printers were monitored in an open office and the researchers recorded data on three laser printers in an experimental chamber. The study included popular models in the US and Australia sold internationally under the Canon, HP Color Laserjet, Ricoh and Toshiba brand names.
Most of the printer-generated particles detected were ultrafine, Morawska said, explaining that such contaminants are easily inhaled into the smallest passageways of the lungs where they could pose “a significant health threat”.
“It wasn’t an area we consciously decided to study,” Morawska said in an interview. “We came across it by chance. Initially we were studying the efficiency of ventilation systems to protect office settings from outdoor air pollutants. We soon realised that we were seeing air pollution originating indoors, from laser printers.”
The study found that indoor particle levels in the office air increased fivefold during work hours due to printer use. Printers emitted more particles when operating with new toner cartridges and when printing graphics and images that require greater quantities of toner.
As a result of the study, the scientists are calling on government officials to consider regulating emission levels from laser printers. “By all means, this is an important indoor source of pollution,” Morawska said. “There should be regulations.”
The research is scheduled for publication in the 1 August online issue of the American Chemical Society’s Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T).
Latest stories from Finance
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
C++ GUI Developer - Financial Services - London Tech...
This is an opportunity for a bright and talented Java...
C# Application Developer Location : Nottingham...
Experienced Web Developer Wanted for Financial Sector...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Need the List
Could someone provide the list of safe and unsafe laser printers? The list bookmarked in the comment above lists the some of the same HP printers as both no emissions and high emissions. How can this be? We need the specifics of what the list is. Thanks!
Posted by: Greg Jesson 08 Aug 2007
Take it seriously, from a printer tech
I am also a printer tech, and although I have only worked on laser printers for 1 year I have some words of advice for the doubters. I work in a laser cartridge recycling center, which houses a somewhat dirty recycling room for refurbishing toners. Within about 2 weeks of working in the facility I found myself developing a nasty cough. I went to the doctor about 2 months into my employment and found I had Bronchitis. I needed an antibioctic to restore my health. I knew it was because of where I work but the pay is good so I cannot leave yet. For the person who said this study was BS, take a look here: http://www.donationcoder.com/Forums/bb/index.php?topic=9439.msg70397#msg70397 Some of the printers listed with the highest emissions (HP 1320, 2420, 4250) are fairly new being manufactured within the past years. Some printers listed with no emissions (4000, 4+, 5si) are OVER 5 YEARS OLD. What might this story point out? That newer printers may be getting increasingly unsafe as they become cheaper, and the health effects may not be fully realized yet. Final thoughts: Dont throw your laser printers away, just keep following this story until the facts become much more clear. Be well everyone.
Posted by: David 03 Aug 2007
bunch of BS!
Another BS story. I can tell you personally that this is another tactic to scare everyone. I've been in the photocopier & printer business for over TWENTY FIVE YEARS. I repair them. I'm around them day in day out. I've breathed more toner & dust in a week than most people will in a year. I've had NO health problems, I get a complete checkup once a year. If you are GENETICALLY predisposed to be at a greater risk for cancer, hell, just about anything will screw you up. Hell, my grandfather went to france in WW1 in 1918 and started smoking unfiltered camel cigarettes and continued to smoke them until 1971 when the doctor said that the surgeon general keep poking his nose around and wanted people to quit. My grandfather died in 1991 at the age of NINETY SEVEN with absolutely NO cancer! I have the MSDS (materal safety data sheets) on the consumable supplies that are used in laser printers & copiers. They have no risks, unless you put the dust from the toner in an enclosed area and set it on fire....it might blow up (similar to a grain dust explosion). Once again, some idiot researcher has come up with a study to back some more studies so he can continue to suckle off of the teat of the government! You'll get more "health risks" on a copier or printer by burning your f**king fingers on the fuser unit, trying to remove a paper jam.
Posted by: Rusty 01 Aug 2007