01 Oct 2010
The UK government is to be taken to the European Union Court of Justice over its failure fully to implement rules relating to the confidentiality of electronic communications such as email or internet browsing.
The action is being brought by the European Commission (EC), and refers specifically to existing UK laws governing the confidentiality of electronic communications, which contravene the nation's obligations under EU law, according to the Commission.
These laws are set out in ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC and Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC, and the Commission outlined the three specific concerns it has about the UK's stance on data protection relating to these directives.
The UK could face an unlimited fine for non-compliance if found guilty, according to legal experts.
First, the UK lacks an independent national authority to supervise the interception of some communications, despite this being required under the ePrivacy and Data Protection Directives.
Secondly, UK law currently authorises the interception of communications when the person intercepting the communications has "reasonable grounds for believing " that consent to do so has been given.
The Commission said that this does not comply with EU rules specifying that consent must be a "freely given, specific and informed indication of a person's wishes".
Lastly, current UK laws that prohibit the unlawful interception of data are limited to "intentional" interception only, whereas EU law requires that all member states prohibit and introduce sanctions against all unlawful interceptions, regardless of intent.
The Home Office issued a statement saying that it is "disappointed" that the case had been referred to the European Court of Justice, but that it is working on the issues outlined.
"We are planning to make changes to address the Commission's concerns, and will be setting out more detail on any necessary amendments or legislation in due course," a spokesperson said.
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
What Privacy?
In the UK we have another nation who monitors all and I mean all electronic communication. If you say the wrong thing or type something that could be misconstrued as a threat, you will be visited in short order. It's happened time and again. There is no such thing in the UK as free speech or any constitution to protect it.
Posted by: Poppa 01 Oct 2010