09 Feb 2009
Wikipedia users can now see how page entries are edited thanks to new technology launched by a Silicon Valley research company.
WikiDashboard will show users how many times each subject page has been edited and which editors have contributed the most to a page. Users will also be given details about the editors, such as how involved they have been with other articles.
"The idea is that, if we provide social transparency and enable attribution of work to individual workers in Wikipedia, this will eventually result in increased credibility and trust in the page content, and therefore higher levels of trust in Wikipedia," said the Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in a statement.
Trust in Wikipedia fades when editors get their facts wrong. This year US Senator Edward Kennedy was pronounced dead by the site, and news has just emerged that a Sunday Times correspondent was wrongly said to be the son of Roy Hattersley.
By naming writers involved in the site's content, the new dashboard should help to reduce the number of errors in entries.
But the analysis tool could increase competition between Wikipedia and Google's Knol project, which was launched last year as a Wikipedia rival.
The main difference between the two sites is that Google's encyclopaedia allows readers to see who edited each page. Now, depending on the takeup of the dashboard, there could be more similarities between the two services, although the Google tool will still remain different because it prevents articles from being edited by participants unknown to the author, and prevents multiple contributions to one topic.
PARC works with new ventures and enterprises to discover technology concepts to solve particular needs and drive value to customers. The centre is credited with innovations such as Ethernet, the graphical user interface, object-oriented programming and ubiquitous computing.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client, a leading telecoms firm listed in the Sunday...
ASP.NET C#, .Net 3.5, .Net 4.0 MVC developer to join...
Linux Systems Administrator - £45k - London A Linux...
Unix systems administrator required to work for leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
It's not just Wikipedia that can make errors
A little fact-checking would be nice, especially if the article is about inaccuracy. Wikipedia articles have always listed the authors, along with every change ever made to every article, in the history tab at the top of the page. WikiDashboard just provides a different interface for this. Too, the Giles Hattersley story was in error--he never had a Wikipedia article before that article was published, and some pretty detailed searching hasn't revealed the errors he mentioned as existing in Wikipedia, either currently or at any point in the past. A correction has been published to this effect, though it still feels a little misleading to me.
Posted by: Tracy Poff 10 Feb 2009