27 Oct 2006
Software asset management (SAM) – which ensures companies are compliant with software licence terms – is available as a hosted, managed service, thanks to a new system launched by Liken Group.
The service is aimed at removing the operational pains and reducing the costs of running SAM software internally.
Conventionally, companies bought a SAM tool and implemented it themselves. But it is seen as yet another compliance overhead that IT departments have to cope with.
Furthermore, SAM tools record what software is running on a network, but they don't cross-match this with actual software licences, and automatic identification alone cannot keep pace with all the software updates on a typically distributed corporate network.
Liken’s service uses the customer’s own software or Liken's e-link licence management toolkit, to gather data at regular intervals from across the customer’s network. The data is then sent via a secure link to Liken’s servers to check that executable files are accurately reconciled.
While initial data is processed, Liken experts review the client’s internal controls and procedures for purchasing and storing software. At the same time an independent risk assessment is compiled identifying file-sharing software, outdated versions and any other installed software that impacts on the security of the network.
Knowing what is installed does not mean that the network is compliant. Therefore, Liken compiles a detailed compliance report. This adheres to best practice standards including ISO/IECs: 19770, 17799 and 27001 and ITIL. Liken also works closely with FAST and the Business Software Alliance.
Latest stories from Law
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Python Developer / Python Django Team Leader London 55k...
Java Architect / Application Architect London 70k...
SQL Server Developer SQL Server Banking SQL Server...
User Interface Developer / UI Developer / User interface...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
SAM & tools offer more than simply compliance
In response to Andrew Charlesworth?s article (?Software license management becomes a service?? 10/27): Although I do not dispute the potential advantages of a hosted software asset management (SAM) service, I respectfully differ with the article?s representation of SAM as primarily a ?compliance? issue. While license compliance is certainly a critical component of SAM, the terms are all too often used interchangeably. SAM, in fact, entails many important elements beyond simply compliance. According to the ITIL Best Practise Guide on SAM: ?Software Asset Management (SAM) is all of the infrastructure and processes necessary for the effective management, control and protection of the software assets within an organisation, throughout all stages of their lifecycle.? SAM, in its truest sense, is a holistic approach to managing and optimizing the acquisition, deployment, use, and disposal of those assets, resulting in the creation of ongoing organizational advantages. Related to this point, the article states that SAM tools are ?seen as yet another compliance overhead that IT departments have to cope with.? While it is true that SAM tools are often perceived in this manner, it is important to note that when license compliance efforts are combined with other elements of a proper SAM program, this overhead is typically more than offset by reduced software (and hardware) expenditures, greater IT efficiencies, lower support costs, heightened security, and mitigated risk. I also question the author?s statement that ?SAM tools record what software is running on a network, but they don't cross-match this with actual software licenses.? On the contrary: not only do many SAM tools reconcile installed software with licenses owned, but some go much further by offering functionality such as software usage tracking, application control, patch management, incident tracking, and deployment. This is a key point, in that all of these capabilities can be (and for countless organizations are) central elements of a productive and comprehensive SAM program. The author also states that ??automatic identification alone cannot keep pace with all the updates on a typically distributed corporate network.? To be certain, no SAM tool (or hosted service, for that matter) can perform the task of locating, aggregating?and ultimately maintaining?all of an organization?s licensing information from disparate, incompatible sources into a database that can be ?cross-checked? with installed licenses. Whether this process is performed by internal staff or by an outsourced third party, it will continue to be a predominantly manual task that requires dedicated resources and a firm understanding that the efforts will pay off in the long run. Again, my points above are not meant to debate the relative merits of a hosted SAM service versus an internally deployed SAM product. Rather, I wanted to take this opportunity to clarify the ?true? definition of SAM; confirm that many SAM tools can, in fact, perform license reconciliation; and emphasize that many technologies are available that address a set of SAM issues much broader than simply compliance. Jeff Kelsey Vice President of Products and Services Express Metrix
Posted by: Jeff Kelsey 02 Nov 2006