23 Jun 2005
Cosmos 1, the world's first space craft propelled by a solar sail, has lost contact with its base station.
The ship was launched on schedule from a submarine using a converted Russian ICBM and should have signalled to three base stations on Earth and deployed its eight solar sails, each a quarter of the thickness of a plastic bag.
However, only a few faint signals were received after take off and those have now stopped.
"That the weak signals were recorded at the expected times of spacecraft passes over the ground stations is encouraging, but in no way are they conclusive enough for us to be sure that they came from Cosmos 1 working in orbit," said project director Louis Friedman.
The Russian Space Agency indicated that its Volna rocket may have had a problem during its first or second stage firing.
The mission was funded by the Planetary Society, a group set up by US astronomer Carl Sagan to encourage space flight.
Latest stories from Hardware
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Web Developer LAMP HTML CSS Bash Linux Cambridge...
Drupal / Web Developer ( PHP, Drupal, JavaScript, JQuery...
Web / .NET Developer ( ASP.NET, VB.NET, HTML, CSS, SQL...
Analyst / Developer (Case Management) - NW London - £35...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Sad how far we haven't come...
In all the time we humans have had to develop our capabilities, it's so sad to see that you two (fairly) intelligent examples of the species can't even see that the other one has a point. Baskin Robbins made a fortune in the '60s, before the first moon landing, when they realised that reasonable people could prefer strawberry or mint chip or blueberry. Have we gotten nowhere in the last 40 years? The FIRST step in any debate is to understand the other guy's position. Get a clue, people!
Posted by: Ffej 05 Apr 2006
I beg to differ
As has been pointed out many times the human race is too special to be entrusted to such a fragile basket as Earth. It is a logical impossibility for a long term civilisation to survive on just one planet. Either climactic change or an outside problem like a comet strike could wipe us out at any time. Besides, it's what we do as a species: explore. We went out of the caves and colonized the land, then built ships and inhabited the world. This is the next step; there should always be new horizons for mankind.
Posted by: Iain 27 Jun 2005
waste of money!
I feel we have enough info on space to realise we're never going to colonise another planet, lets sort earth out first, or is there another reason for all this exploration?
Posted by: bryan boothby 24 Jun 2005