12 Jun 2009
Browser makers have spoken out against Microsoft's latest proposal to open up competition in the market by shipping copies of Windows 7 without Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) bundled in.
Opera's chief technology officer, Hakon Wium Lie, said that he was "not impressed at all" by the latest proposal from Microsoft, which would let computer manufacturers choose which browser or browsers to include on new Windows 7 PCs.
"If this had happened in 1997 when the competition case was first being heard in the US, maybe it would have helped in creating a level playing field," Lie said. "But this is too little, too late. It won't restore competition in the browser market."
Lie added that, although IE8 would not be bundled into Windows 7 as standard by Microsoft, computer makers would choose the Microsoft browser anyway as this was the easy option. "[Microsoft is] putting all the pieces into place for OEMs to put in IE8 anyway," he said.
Instead of the Microsoft proposal to ship browser-free copies of Windows 7 in Europe, Lie supported the European Commission's (EC's) recommendation of a 'ballot screen'. This would present users with a choice of browsers when first starting up their new PC, along with an explanation of what each one offers.
"It would be easy from there for users to install a browser, and go online and browse," Lie said. "This would actually give users a genuine choice."
Lie was speaking to vnunet.com from a planned media event in Brussels, where Opera has also been meeting with the EC about the browser market. He added that he had just come from demonstrating a mock-up of the ballot screen to the EC.
Rival browser firm Mozilla, creator of Firefox, was also less than impressed by Microsoft's proposals.
"It's impossible to evaluate what this means unless and until Microsoft describes, completely and with specificity, all the incentives and disincentives applicable to Windows OEMs," John Lilly, chief executive of Mozilla Corporation, said in an email statement.
"Without this it's impossible to tell if Microsoft is giving something with one hand and taking it away with the other, and more to the point, it's impossible to tell whether this does anything more than change the technical installation process of the OEMs and make life more difficult for people upgrading to Windows 7."
Microsoft's latest proposal was aimed at appeasing the EC, which has been investigating the software giant for anti-competitive behaviour and abusing its dominant position in the marketplace by tying its own web browser into its Windows operating system.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Python Developer / Python Django Team Leader London 55k...
Java Architect / Application Architect London 70k...
SQL Server Developer SQL Server Banking SQL Server...
User Interface Developer / UI Developer / User interface...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Will it really matter?
The European Commission's idea of a "ballot screen" where users would be presented with a choice of browsers and information about those browsers when first starting up their new PCs is a great idea, providing that the process is easy enough to reduce confusion to a negligible level. Would this appreciably change the browser share numbers? While I would like to think giving people a choice would further cut into M$'s lead I really don't think it would have much of an effect. Why? Most computer users in the U.S. are either stupid, naive, or apathetic when it comes to the browser they use. They turn on their computers and press an icon to get internet access. The vast majority in this country don't know or care how this happens, whether it's via IE8, Firefox, Opera, Chrome, or by plain old magic. They simply want the internet. If given a choice I feel most people would unwisely choose M$, not by virtue of the browser's features as much as by the fact that, like the Windows 7 operating system, it's Microsoft. It's sad to say but I feel the long history everyone has with Windows operating systems and Internet Explorer, combined with the fact they have never used anything else, will be the deciding factor in the decision making process, and thus M$'s browser share remains pretty much unchanged. In Europe, unlike the U.S. where IE is so entrenched, it's a different story.
Posted by: Tom Wyker 23 Jun 2009
I can see why they're not impressed...
Surely they are not impressed because without the piece of rubbish that is IE preinstalled consumers would have no incentive to switch? OEM Windows editions are especially problematic as the manufacturers usually load all sorts of rubbish onto IE, further slowing it. Agree, IE is a part of Windows, in fact its more an extension of Explorer than a standalone program.
Posted by: JH 15 Jun 2009
Its getting petty now...
I can understand why browser manufacturers are unhappy about how IE comes with Windows, but, for people who only want to use their computer sporadically, it makes sense to have a bundled option; a dafault easy option. What is their to gain by confusing a new user who just simply wants to surf the internet. The way development is moving, all main browsers offer the same features, and if you want a specific product they will go out and get it and use it. Of those 65% who use IE who uses it just because they arent bothered about browser choice? Take those people away and im sure market share is better represented. If a choice of browser at startup is offered, it leads to excess installed redundant files, or a novice user jus being confused and overwhelmed. At the the end of the day, windows is a microsoft platform. We dont complain that Safari is preloaded to macs, or im sure if google made an OS, its suite of programs would be installed too. As long as IE is a removal piece of software in W7, like other browser options, this should suffice.
Posted by: Andrew Prince 12 Jun 2009