19 Apr 2007
Security firm Barracuda Networks has added Predictive Sender Profiling capabilities to its latest anti-spam firewall.
Using a network of more than 40,000 customer systems worldwide, Barracuda has created a compilation of email available for profiling the behaviour of spammers and determining a sender's identity when identity obfuscation techniques are used.
"While 2006 marked the beginning of an assault on image spam, 2007 is marking yet another trend through spammer identity obfuscation," said Stephen Pao, vice president of product management at Barracuda.
"Taking an analogy from the financial industry, where reputation analysis is like a FICO score, identity obfuscation, like identity theft, requires profiling against anomalous behaviour."
Predictive Sender Profiling targets spammers who obfuscate their identities through telltale signs such as sending too many emails from a single network address, or attempting to send to too many invalid recipients.
Other techniques include sending email blasts on the first day after registering a domain, and using free internet services to redirect to known spam domains.
"Reputation is a computationally efficient way to profile spam," said Michael Osterman, president of Osterman Research.
"However, we have observed that spoofing, botnets and other means of hiding behind the reputation of another sender have made this technique less effective than it might otherwise be.
"As a result, while we believe that reputation is very important, other spam prevention techniques that profile sender behaviour will be very important."
For network addresses used to send email, Barracuda Spam Firewalls download black and white lists to efficiently differentiate those emails to be blocked or allowed with minimal processing.
Other network addresses in the 'grey area' are left for further analysis through nine subsequent spam and virus defence layers.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Software Developer / Web Developer (C# ASP.Net) – Leeds...
Required for my Market Leading Client. The position requires...
PHP Web Developer - Nottingham - £20K My client is...
IT Trainer / E-Learning Designer - London - This leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
We use a Barracuda M600 Anti-spam Firewall..
And have had only a minimal of problems, mostly related to training Windows-centric technicians to work with a web based Linux embedded platform, primarily in the area of teaching understanding of the need to use 'regex' statements for custom rules. I personally manage our Barracuda, and after getting our management convinced to let me have my way with the configuration, we haven't had any real problems out of it (at all) since. In most cases, the problem with a Barracuda anti-spam appliance isn't the appliance or it's firmware, but rather the configuration placed on it by it's administrator. However, I do have one complaint about them... I wish there was a way to control the order in which scanning occurs, so that this way, I could have IP-blacklist scans performed before personal or global whitelist checks. This would eliminate spoofers that use CIDRs that I've already built block rules for.
Posted by: Carl Vancil 29 Sep 2008
Spam
Barracuda is kind of annoying to me. I have sent emails to people who have it that I know, and have seen them get deleted as spam. I would go with another service, like Anonymizer Anonymous Surfing. It's got all the anti-malware software you need in the suite, and it's very "intelligent." At least worth checking out.
Posted by: JimmyJackFunk21 20 Apr 2007