10 Apr 2008
In the game of tit for tat going on between Microsoft and Yahoo, the Redmond Giant issued a response late yesterday to Yahoo’s rejection earlier in the week.
Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, issued a statement saying: "Any definitive agreement between Yahoo and Google would consolidate over 90 per cent of the search advertising market in Google's hands. This would make the market far less competitive, in sharp contrast to our own proposal to acquire Yahoo. We will assess closely all of our options.
"Our proposal remains the only alternative put forward that offers Yahoo shareholders full and fair value for their shares, gives every shareholder a vote on the future of the company, and enhances choice for content creators, advertisers, and consumers."
Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer had warned Yahoo that he would lobby stockholders to elect a new board of directors if the current board failed to accept a deal.
Yahoo sent a written response to last week's letter from Ballmer, stating that the board's view of the proposal had not changed.
"We continue to believe that your proposal is not in the best interests of Yahoo and our stockholders," read the statement.
"Contrary to statements in your letter, stockholders representing a significant portion of our outstanding shares have indicated to us that your proposal substantially undervalues Yahoo."
Microsoft proposed a stock deal worth $44bn to buy Yahoo in late January. Yahoo rejected the offer less than two weeks later, saying that the proposed deal greatly undervalued the firm.
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Field/Site Engineering Manager/Leader Brief: Polar...
Product Manager, Open Repository (ref:BMC/PMR) End...
Java/J2EE Software Developer/Programmer - Dotcom/ eCommerce...
Field/Site Engineering Manager/Leader Brief: Polar...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
In search of truth...
The fact is that the largest of the search engines distort the results by giving priority to those that pay. This means that when you search you don't get things in their natural order of relevance. The knock on effect is that by doing this, the large search engines are; a) Not necessarily telling you about what you are looking for, and b) Stopping any up and coming Internet based company from being seen easily (sometimes at-all) during searches. These search engines return a result distorted by commerce. They are not knowledge driven and should state so very clearly on the front page so everyone realises that some of the most relevant results will only be available to us if we do the same search on other more independent search engines. They are perfectly entitled to run their search engines like this, I'm not disputing that, but they MUST make it clear to users that their results will favour their subscribers first, and that if a person can't find what they are looking for that they should search much deeper down the list of returned results. Microsoft would do well to bite the bullet and create a truly independant search engine and not be drawn into the tacky practices of existing ones. That's just my personal opinion of course.
Posted by: David Lambert 17 Apr 2008
YANG, GET BETTER ADVICE
AOL is not Yahoo's salvation by any means. Yang should get some new advisors. Then look for some enlightened strategies ... even just a little creative... not panic driven.
Posted by: PacificGatePost 10 Apr 2008