11 Dec 2007
Google's rumoured plan to offer a virtual Hard Disk Drive (HDD) service could make the search giant higher margins than those enjoyed by suppliers of physical hard disks such as Seagate Technology, experts calculate.
iSuppli believes that, while such a service would be useful for consumers, it could be very lucrative for Google.
"Google’s plan has simple economics: it can make more money in the storage business than the companies that actually make HDDs,” said Krishna Chander, senior analyst, storage systems for iSuppli.
Media reports indicate that Google is set to offer a service that allows users to store files from their hard drives on its servers. Not only could the service provide much-needed storage space for users whose HDDs are clogged with music, video and images, it could also allow subscribers access to their files from any PC, simply by entering their password on the Google site.
Chander notes that the concept of online virtual storage is not exactly new. Yahoo, Xdrive LLC and others have been offering similar services, typically 5GB of free storage, with more space available for a fee.
However, Google could trump these competing services by offering as much as 50GB of free storage, Chander estimates, adding that Google could generate significant returns from this free service by placing advertisements on the storage-service website.
Chander expects that about 4.2 million users eventually may employ Google online storage system. Assuming Google collects $50 per user per year in advertisement revenue collected from users of the free version of the system, the revenue potential is about $210m annually.
On the expense side, Chander estimates that it would cost Google 25 cents per GB for those 50GB of free storage. Google may have to install storage capacity of about 210,000TB. This will require the purchase of about 210,000 1B-capacity HDDs, representing a gross expense of about $52.5 million.
“This would represent a good return for Google,” Chander said.
“While a typical HDD supplier makes about an 18 per cent gross margin for a desktop-PC-class hard drive, Google could command a gross margin of 75 per cent. This would give Google more than four times the rate of return compared of the HDD suppliers.”
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Position:Oracle Applications eBusiness Suite Suport...
Software Developer A leading UK Software Application...
I am looking for a permanent senior Drupal Developer...
Retail Consultant - Data Transformation and Migration...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Yeah Right.
"On the expense side, Chander estimates that it would cost Google 25 cents per GB for those 50GB of free storage. Google may have to install storage capacity of about 210,000TB. This will require the purchase of about 210,000 1B-capacity HDDs, representing a gross expense of about $52.5 million." Now either Chander is "intellectually challenged" or the reporter or editor have incorrectly represented chanders view. O.K. so lets start with .21 million 1TB drives. 210,000 x 720 grams = 151 Metric tonnes.(Specifications from seagate 750GB sata drive.) 147 x 102 x 26 millimetres =0.0003898 cubic metres x 210,000 =82 cubic metres. If these drives are stored in, say a mobile rack (a good approximation of stored dimensions), 230 x 150 x 45 mm = 0.0015525 M3 or total 326 cubic metres. Allowing for 1 cubic metre per pallet in a storage warehouse means paying storage fees for the space taken up by over 300 pallets. Now i am guessing that would cost a lot less than $1 million per annum. Compared to a purchase price of $52.5 million it seems like a good deal, that is if i havent overlooked some obscure but significant cost. Hmmmm... let me think for a moment .... now maybe ive missed something here but arent hard drives only accesssible online if they are plugged into a computer? Oh thats right, i remember now, a $250 1TB HDD is useless without a computer. So how much extra will this cost? Well it will require a dedicated building(s), 3 megawatts of power just for the HDDs, a huge number of servers, cabling, racks, cooling, extra drives for redundancy, staff, maintenance, upgrades and so on. Well he did say $52 million was a "gross expense". Google currently offers around 2.5 GB of free storage and if historical price drops for HDDs continue then 50GB or so may become available after 2013 assuming google use the same financial / market model. But dont hold yor breath waiting.
Posted by: Theo Pardilla 16 Dec 2007
50 gb unlikely
good to see the numbers behind the estimates. although, i'm not too sure google would jump in with 50gb straight away, considering their history of launching products small and then increasing features. considering the potential for online storage, supply may not be able to match demand (the launch of google analytics). my guess is they'd start off with something like 10GB, to test the waters, and then increase it later.
Posted by: techquicky 12 Dec 2007
Nothing Impossible
In recent years I have been calculating HDD cost by cents for every GB whenever I was out to buy a new HDD. I never though that this could bring in so big numbers of $$$s. Wow, what a noble and great idea. I think Google with start with 50GB free and time will tell us, how much more space it will provide for free.
Posted by: Googler 12 Dec 2007