28 Mar 2009
Every industry has its share of villains, and the computing world is no different. This reputation is sometimes earned, sometimes not. The term 'villain' stems from Roman times and was used to describe someone who worked the land but was without honour. In later years it evolved into many forms, ranging from the man in a black hat and twisted moustache tying a young maiden to railroad tracks, to Keyser Söze from the 1995 film The Usual Suspects.
You'd be hard pressed to find such villains in the lists below. None has killed anyone (that we know of) and their actions have not been criminal in the most part, with one or two exceptions. Instead, they are people who we feel have either harmed the industry in some way, or just really annoyed us.
Some are shrewd businessmen whose tactics have garnered them a long list of enemies. Others are well-meaning individuals whose mistakes earned them the ire of the public, while still others are moral crusaders who don't mind being seen as a heel by the unwashed masses.
In the spirit of Newton's third law, we'll be doing an IT heroes piece next week. Let us know if there's anyone you think should be included on the list.
Honourable
Mention: Deidre LaCarte
Shaun Nichols: In the late 1990s as the internet was carving
out its place in mainstream culture, a student named Deidre LaCarte created a
web page as a tribute to her pet hamster. The result was, you guessed it,
Hampsterdance,
one of the earliest and most annoying internet memes ever recorded.
The page combined a long collection of dancing cartoon hamsters with an infectious, high-pitched jingle that was, ironically, a bit like having an actual rodent gnawing at one's brain.
However, the site was also a hit with the burgeoning crowd of web 'newbies'. The page became the first of many pointless internet phenomena, and is likely to have driven hundreds of junior high school computer teachers to seek psychiatric help.
Iain Thomson: I have to say I'm gobsmacked at Shaun's restraint on this one. When we were coming up with the list LaCarte was one of his top picks, and certainly the one that inspired the most bile. It's not often we discuss a list and the phrase "impaled on a rusty spike" is heard, not even when it comes to Darl McBride.
Hampsterdance was annoying certainly. It spawned cheesy singles that made it into the charts in a number of countries, and I blame it for the Dancing Baby syndrome that took off later, and made it onto the egregious Ally McBeal.
As memes go, it was everywhere for a while but its influence has faded. It seems the pain, for some, has not.
Honourable
mention: Ted Stevens
Iain Thomson: The former Senator from Alaska earned ridicule
for his 2006 speech against net neutrality, in which he described the internet
as a "series of tubes" and managed to confuse the internet and email.
What made this worse was that he had a major role in regulating internet commerce. It's a bit like your doctor showing a complete lack of knowledge by prescribing a course of leeches for a bad back. Here was a chap who showed cavalier disregard for the industry he was regulating, and his words sent shivers down the spines of people in the business of building e-commerce.
In actual fact the tube analogy from a technical standpoint could have been justified by someone who knew what they were talking about. But Stevens patently didn't, and it sounded like he was reading a poorly formed briefing paper from a lobbyist rather than expressing a view.
Net neutrality is too important to be left to people who don't know what they are talking about. Following his conviction on seven corruption charges, Stevens is now thankfully out of the loop on internet regulation and may be spending some time in prison, where one hopes he won't spend time finding out another wrong use of a series of tubes.
Shaun Nichols: Stevens may have made it into the top 10 had his error not been so laughable. The scary thought is that it came in the context of such an important debate.
At the time he made his infamous quote, Stevens was probably the best-informed person in the room on the subject of net neutrality. Think about that for a moment; these men are debating what essentially amounts to the future of e-commerce and communications in the US, and the most knowledgeable person in this group thinks that the internet functions much in the same way as the pneumatic deposit system at your local drive-through bank branch.
As disliked as he may be in the computing world, Stevens is perhaps even more of a villain among his constituents in Alaska. The former senator now faces a considerable prison term for corruption.
Latest stories from Skills
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Electronics Engineer, Real Time Control Systems Engineer...
Electronics Software Engineer - C - Control Systems Programming...
I'm looking for a Software Developer that will report...
A Principal ETL Consultant with expertise in IBM InfoSphere...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
The villains left out
The US legislators. Why? Because they failed to pass legislation sufficiently strong to prevent Microsoft to become the worst monopoly in the world. Bill Gates is the genius to exploit this weakness, not the villain who made it. A businessman must go along the edge if he wants to be successful, and that's what he did. Congrats, even though I suffer from the excessive pricing. Shame on the failing legislators. And last but not least: Once more the government has failed to regulate an industry to serve all, not only the select few.
Posted by: Peter B. K. 01 Apr 2009
Internet Explorer 6
This has cost millions ... if not billions ... around the world in costs added to every web development in the time spent making sure that sometimes even the simplest site is served up by this diabolical browser that still has too great a hold on the internet. I curse him for it on many a day.
Posted by: shane 01 Apr 2009
First Spammer is No Villian
The first guy to send an unsolicited commercial email to a few hundred people is no villain. If he would have ignored the hue and cry that resulted and sent another 10,000 messages he would be a villain. But he didn't do that. Spammers and their customers are despicable and there are many tens of thousands of them that are infinitely more villainous than that poor soul who innocently sent the first one.
Posted by: RalpDaly28 01 Apr 2009
missing one
I think Iain Thomson and Shaun Nichols forgot the man, whoever he was, who first came up with the insane idea of letting users click to multiple pages when publishing a top 10 list.
Posted by: Ebert 30 Mar 2009
I can think of more Villainous names
How about John Scully? I think Jerry Yang for throwing Yahoo in the toilet. What about Comcast for boosting speeds then introducing caps? Maybe the Conficker Worm creator? My opinion who should be on the list.
Posted by: Geekazine 29 Mar 2009
Put it all on one page
Put it all on one page
Posted by: Yeah 29 Mar 2009
Double Wow
Nice wash job. You come up with a list that doesn't include Microsoft as a company, in your top ten?? Twice convicted of illegal monopoly actions, that uses it's financial muscle to get exactly what it wants. Killer of Netscape. Fined(twice) nearly a billion dollars by the EU for illegal OS/IE tying practices to the exclusion of any competition. A company that has saddled the world with an OS that costs it's users billions to make secure. A company that backed SCO. No mention of the year 2000 bug which cost companies, individuals and whole countries billions to amend. Then you let it's chief architect off the hook by lauding his altruistic actions which are in themselves damaging to the third world countries concerned since he has total control of where the money goes rather than unconditionally donating it to where it would do the most good for the most people. Tho' I'm no Jobs fan, his inclusion is a joke... just because you don't like his management style? Unbelievable. You guys live somewhere very dark and smelly.
Posted by: ardaz 29 Mar 2009
Not bad, but a fatal mistake at the end
I'd probably arrange the list slightly differently myself, but that nit pick goes ignored for what I consider to be a bit of a fatal flaw in the comments made at the end for the RIAA/MPAA selection at the end. Quoted: "Let me say right off the bat that theft is wrong. You can't walk into a store and start helping yourself to CDs and DVDs without paying by saying that you have a fast internet connection and so you're entitled to get stuff for free." Your own argument against the RIAA/MPAA's actions would be strengthened even further if you could distinguish the difference between copyright infringement and theft. Copyright infringement is not theft. To waltz into a store and steal copies sitting on the shelf, you are removing a physical product from the property of the store itself, if you were to succeed in this moment of criminality. Something is physically lost and has to be manufactured, shipped and restocked again to be replaced. However, when it comes to copyright infringement... making a copy of an object, or in this case, the data that exists on a physical slab of plastic... that slab of plastic still remains in the hands of whoever made a copy of it. When they send a copy of the data on that slab of plastic, there becomes two copies of it... and again, that slab of plastic STILL remains in the hands of whoever made that first copy of it. When you download, copies do not go missing from store shelves... nor can you directly say that it means that those copies will go unsold because of a download. The culture that we live in today dates further back than people realise: Try before you buy. Reader's Digest. Shareware. In-store demo displays. When the fat cats running these organizations as a proxy for lawsuits on behalf of the member labels say that each download equals a lost sale, I can easily argue that anyone who downloads an album from The Pirate Bay likely never intended to buy it from the store in the first place. I can also say, albiet only from my own experience and of those I know, that being able to download tracks "for free" has led myself, and others, to go out and purchase legit copies of these releases because we enjoyed them so much. Artists are recognizing the potential for publicity and exposure due to "piracy" and have begun to use it to their advantage. For every Nine Inch Nails, where there is a built in fanbase already well aware of the act, there are hundreds of unknowns who crave this kind of exposure... and have gotten some, due to their open policy of allowing people to sample their works without being called criminals. Copyright infringement is not theft. If it were, people who have been caught downloading could be arrested. But they can't. Copyright infringement is a civil issue, not a criminal one. Being a pirate, or a mere downloader, two sides of the same coin in all intents and purposes... is not a criminal act no matter how much the RIAA and the MPAA want to make it so. However, when it comes to the RIAA and MPAA for the type of actions they have taken against their very own customer base... the brief summary of why they're hated is apt, but incomplete. I think it is definitely worth mentioning that the actions that they have taken in the legal system blatantly reeks of extortion. So much that motions and counter claims accusing them of violating the RICO Act has actually gotten serious attention. The real criminals are the fronts, called the RIAA and MPAA, for how they have abused the legal system and their very own customers.
Posted by: JamesM 29 Mar 2009
Spam
I agree the biggest villain on the list is RIAA/MPAA. You should at least give Orrin Hatch a dishonorable mention for his proposal to legalize attacks on pirating computers. And what does RIAA/MPAA do to justify even 5 cents a song? They are now technologically obsolete parasites. The artists should get all the revenue. That said, the first spammer, innocent and legitimate as his message was, kicked off an avalanche. What is killing ALL media, newspapers and Internet alike, is advertising. From a useful beginning as a means of telling people of products and services, it has long since passed the point of diminishing returns and has become a manic frenzy of competing for a finite pool of money. Solution? Tax the bloody hell out of it. Make it financial suicide to advertise unless you have a serious hope of attracting business. A buck a popup or spam message, per machine. No bankruptcy protection. Treat the tax revenue like drug money and go after their houses and anyone else who benefits from their money. Computer intrusion is such a national security issue it's a no brainer. Ban all electronic intrusion, period, including intrusive software that users "consent" to install (even Genuine DisAdvantage). Make it forgery to impersonate any other person on line. If Congress won't act, invoke the PATRIOT Act and issue executive orders. Send Delta Force to take out the foreign bad actors. Finally, there should be a joint dishonorable mention for the people who distribute child porn on line, as well as the panicky nitwits pushing for ever more insane measures to stop it.
Posted by: Steve Dutch 28 Mar 2009