17 Jun 2010
A group of privacy advocates has penned an open letter (PDF) to Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg urging him to make a number of changes to the way users are able to administer their accounts.
The group, which includes the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, PrivacyActivism, Privacy Lives and the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, acknowledged that the social networking site had made some positive changes, but called on Zuckerberg to act on "outstanding privacy problems".
"We are glad to see that Facebook has taken steps in the past weeks to address some of its outstanding privacy problems. However, we are writing to urge you to continue to demonstrate your commitment to the principle of giving users control over how and with whom they share," said the letter.
The group has made six recommendations, including allowing users to decide what applications can access their personal information, and that Facebook makes its 'instant personalisation' opt-in, as opposed to opt out.
The way in which Facebook shares personal information with third-party applications is a constant theme in the letter. The group said that the site should not retain data associated with the 'Like' feature "unless the site visitor chooses to interact with those tools".
"Facebook's latest changes allow users a 'nuclear option' to opt out of applications entirely," the letter said.
"While this is an important setting, it is not adequate for meaningful control. Facebook users should also have the option to choose to share information only with specific applications."
The group has insisted that users be given control over "every piece" of information they share in, or via, Facebook. This should include name, gender, profile picture and the networks with which the user is associated.
Facebook should also improve its own security by using an HTTPS connection on its pages, and make it far easier for users to export content to another social networking service if they decide to leave Facebook.
"Users should have control over the details of their social network and the content that they have uploaded to Facebook, and should be able to export and move that data to another service if they decide they are uncomfortable with Facebook's privacy policies," the letter said.
"Facebook should demonstrate its commitment to user control by giving users easy tools for directly downloading their content and information about their social network, as other companies in the social networking space have already done."
V3.co.uk contacted Facebook for a response to the letter, but had not received a reply at the time of writing.
Latest stories from Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Project Manager, London - Software Solutions (Project...
Project Manager - Hampshire - up to £32K - Fixed Term...
Senior Customer Support Consultant - 2nd/3rd Line Support...
C++/C#/Java developer for a global investment bank within...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Facebook's privacy is good IMO
I think the privacy settings on facebook are great! Apart from not being able to block an individual friend from posting on your wall. (Yes it can be done by not letting them see your wall, but I don't mind them seeing it.. I don't want some friends messing about posting rubbish - sometimes!) They seem to complain about 3rd parties being able to access info.. they're able to access it because the user agrees to it! Their choice, not facebook's problem I say!
Posted by: Peter 18 Jun 2010
Privacy
Hello facebook privacy is laughable,ive been on about this for ages,although ive finished with facebook ages ago,as far as im concerned privacy on facebook doesnt exist,and its getting the same with all the other social networking sites,and its about time it was sorted once and for all
Posted by: Edgar Mills 18 Jun 2010
Privacy groups demand changes to Facebook
Irrespective of adduced changes and retunning prospectives, never at time would there be any satisfaction on advocacy by interest groups. Disenchantment would arise again and again and in particular to increasngly agitations to be heard by those who wants to insbribe their names on complaint data as notice seekers. As we appreciate equilateral justice, we must ask again the level of appatite in frienzy consumption of public Rights and check and balances of the intentions of those paranoid with fear of power manipulations. Once again, what extent is enough or too much to public policy without frequent retunning combats? Don't be surprised if at the same token we return back on inertia.
Posted by: Kotoko 18 Jun 2010
Privacy groups demand changes to Facebook
I find it rather amusing that this group is attacking Facebook in this way. Where are the attacks on, for example, the USA for its inadequate data protection laws, and on Amreican firms (like Dell) who will export your personal data to anywhere and everywhere and there's nothing you can do if you want to buy from them. FB security is quite good in comparison..
Posted by: MK22 17 Jun 2010
well, now, ha ha
Demanded ? They actually demanded ! If I was Mark I'd tell them to shove off. No, that's putting it mildly.
Posted by: Donald 17 Jun 2010