04 Apr 2003
The Apache Software Foundation has rushed to release update 2.0.45 to its web server application to fix an as yet undisclosed Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability.
The foundation warned that all versions of Apache 2 through to 2.0.44 contained a serious DoS flaw discovered discovered by David Endler, director of technical intelligence at security intelligence firm iDefense.
Details of the flaw will not be published until after 7 April, but Apache has advised all users to patch their systems before then.
Apache said that the new release is intended "principally as a security and bug fix release", as it also includes fixes for a number of smaller scale security threats.
But OS2 users received an ominous warning when Apache confirmed that a known DoS vulnerability for the platform will remain open even after the patch has been applied.
OS2 users will have to wait for 2.0.46 to get properly patched, as Apache said that this week's announcement was "too important" to delay.
Apache is the most popular web server on the market, with about 63 per cent of connected businesses using the software.
Updates from Apache can be downloaded here.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A leading US Prop Trading House/Market Maker is currently...
A leading financial services group has an urgent requirement...
UI Developer Wanted - CSS, HTML, JavaScript with .NET...
Java Developer - Gloucestershire - £35-40k per annum...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?