All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Windows Vista security under fire

by Robert Jaques

30 Jan 2007

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this
Windows Vista
Kaspersky Lab believes that Vista's security may not be as effective as promised

Microsoft's Windows Vista is "unlikely to deliver long-term robust security protection", an IT security vendor claimed today.

An article published by Kaspersky Lab questioned whether the current security functions implemented in Vista will be effective.

The report, written by Kaspersky virus analyst Alisa Shevchenko, examined the key security aspects of Vista, including User Account Control, PatchGuard and Internet Explorer 7.

Vista's User Account Control ensures that any user, including the Administrator, has minimal rights, and that any 'suspicious' activity results in either a request for confirmation or a request to enter a password.

However, Shevchenko believes that a large number of harmless actions can be classed as 'suspicious', even if they turn out not to be malicious.

Alerting the user to each of these is likely to cause such a high volume of alerts that the user will either disable the feature or enter the Administrator password.

Shevchenko also claimed that "any type of protection can be evaded, and because of this, the advantages provided by this new layer of defence are conditional, and as practice shows, temporary".

He went on to claim that PatchGuard, which monitors modifications to the core system, can be evaded or disabled.

Shevchenko also questioned PatchGuard's protection against root-kits as it only offers protection against certain types of root-kit, and not all.

"Vista is undoubtedly more secure than previous Microsoft operating systems. And a system which is configured in such a way that everything is blocked except for access to designated sites could be regarded as being absolutely secure," said the report.

"However, the majority of users will find the significant restrictions on actions which effectively sterilise the system unacceptable, just as the constant requests to confirm or enter a password for an action which the system defines as being 'potentially dangerous'.

"And it is at this point that the 'almost totally secure' system is transformed in to a 'more vulnerable' system'."

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

36%

0%

10%

54%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Android Developer (Android and .NET) - West Midlands - up to £40k

Android Developer (Android and .NET) - West Midlands...

Regional Architect

Responsibilities: - Delivering End-to-End solutions...

SQL, Marketing Data Manager, West London - to £45K + Bens

SQL, Marketing Data Manager, West London - to £45K...

Software Developer

One of Aston Carters longest standing clients has an...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.