30 May 2009
2.
QuarkXPress
Shaun Nichols: Though it is one of many page layout and
desktop publishing platforms, QuarkXPress has long been considered to be the
most successful tool for designing a printed publication.
QuarkXPress and its peers have become so ubiquitous that those of us who grew up with personal computers sometimes have a hard time imagining that these sort of tasks were once done by hand.
As a result, Quark allowed many smaller companies to enter the publishing business, and made print publications as a whole much more aesthetically appealing.
I was first introduced to Quark in grade school when my stepmother, a graphic designer, showed me how to piece together a template for writing school reports. I still say with a fair amount of confidence that my science paper that year is perhaps the best-looking report on baboons written by an 11 year-old ever to earn a C.
Iain Thomson: Way to make me feel old Shaun. I used Quark in my first journalism job a couple of years after graduation. A quick mental calculation shows you weren't even in double figures back then.
Quark basically drove the entire desktop publishing industry and we were tremendously excited when it came out. It may seem hard to believe but back in the day we had to physically bike pages to the repro shop before sending them to the printers. Quark made magazine publishing quick, easy and cheap.
There have been some disadvantages to be sure. Quark eliminated whole industries, like typesetting and put a sizable dent in the courier business. But that's the thing with new technology: sometimes older professions have to go to the wall. At the same time the rise in the number of publications was dramatic and it's fair to say that without it Shaun or myself might not have had a career.
1.
Mosaic
Iain Thomson: Usually with a top 10 list the number one is the
easiest to work out. This week's was tough, not so much for the application - a
web browser was the obvious choice - but the people behind it.
I argued hard for Firefox and Mozilla, Shaun disagreed and things got so acrimonious I nearly didn't get the second round of beers in. In the end he won down to the force of logic. If we're talking change then the Mosaic team were the ones who did it.
There were other browsers to be sure. Berners-Lee may have kicked things off but he had no idea about the future potential of the internet. Other programmers did, however. Four Finnish students built Erwise in 1992 and a Berkeley student invented ViolaWWW, the most popular browser before Mosiac.
Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina simply built the best product out there. Not the best technically, but one with features that made sense to the majority of computer users, such as the ability to have pictures and text in the same window – something Berners-Lee vehemently objected to at the time. Mosiac proved that the web was more than just text.
The other reason I agreed with Shaun is that in the end we're both right. Mosiac gets the prize rightly, but the team behind it went on to form Netscape, which begot Mozilla and thus Firefox. Just goes to show, you can seldom kill a good idea.
Shaun Nichols: This one was tough. We knew that number one would have to be something to do with browsers, but which one? Netscape Navigator was the first huge commercial success, but with walled garden ISPs such as AOL and Prodigy in the early days of the internet, it wasn't a necessity for users.
Firefox was important, but the browser market had been long developed and established by the time it arrived. And Internet Explorer, well, it was Internet Explorer.
In the end, we decided to go with Mosaic for the simple reason that it established the format and basic design concepts for what would become the web. Mosaic introduced the concept that a web page could be ordered and viewed visually in the same way a regular sheet of paper, with images and text laid out together.
Everyone loves to talk about how the GUI in MacOS and Windows changed the computing world by insulating users from a complicated command line. In a way, Mosaic did the same thing for the internet. It marked a transition from the text-only bulletin board system of ARPAnet and made the internet something which could be accessible and appealing to average users.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Python Developer / Python Django Team Leader London 55k...
Java Architect / Application Architect London 70k...
SQL Server Developer SQL Server Banking SQL Server...
User Interface Developer / UI Developer / User interface...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
You're very inconsistent
You give Mosaic the award but it was Netscape that created the browser industry. Sendmail and Eudora both did more for mail than SNDMSG -It's like saying Baird invented TV. Office was dire for the first few iterations. Excel was the killer app that made Microsoft. Spreadsheets were just so much easier to do with a GUI. When secretaries did WP they used Wordperfect, Multimate and Wordstar. Without these the PC would never have become ubiquitous and Microsoft wouldn't have had a market to steal. At least you didn't mention Windows (without which 90% of PC's in use today wouldn't have had a reason for being). It would also be intersting to consider whether Oracle's market owes more to people growing out of Dbase or Informix than people migrating down off mainframes.
Posted by: Paul Milligan 02 Jun 2009
Instant Messaging?
I am not sure which would be the "winner" but there is not a desktop I know of that doesn't have this in some form or another. Not only is it used at home but heavily in business especially when the company has multiple offices or work from home programs.
Posted by: John B 01 Jun 2009
Ted Codd
Given that it was Ted Codd who set forth the foundations for relational databases, which is what Oracle is, and that it was Chris Date & Hugh Darwen who did most of the following detailed work then shouldn't IBM get the credit you've given to Oracle - given that Ted, Chris & Hugh all worked for IBM at the time!!
Posted by: RightPaddock 01 Jun 2009
Showing your age guys?
I must be a fair bit older than this articles' author, whom I guess isn't old enough to remember the world before Microsoft became dominant (or even existed). IMHO the three most important apps ever in the history of computing are: 1. The enigma code-breaker (Colussus II, Bletchley UK circa 1940). Apart from having a significant effect on the outcome of WWII, this application took the electronic digital computer from theory to reality. joint 2) are Supercalc and Wordstar, because these made micro computers genuinely useful to absolutely everyone in all walks of life. Microsoft Office is so irrelevant I can hardly believe you consider it. If MS hadn't lashed together a few desktop applications, we would just be using someone else's product.
Posted by: Andy pagin 01 Jun 2009
Is this site a joke?
I can't believe this article was cited by the code project newsletter. I suffered through the minesweeper honorable mention (which is a ridiculous nomination) only to fall into SMS as an honorable mention. I thought you were talking about microsoft Systems Management Server, an app that helped keep desktop tech butts in chairs... But no. You were talking about Short Message Servces ... Texting?!?! An app?? I didn't even make it to the to ten list before bailing on the article. The Code Project stinger was right on target "yet another reason to hate top 10 lists"
Posted by: Early AM Rant 01 Jun 2009