01 May 2010
2.
Richard Dawkins
Shaun Nichols: Just about the only person who irks the modern
conservative Christian more than Charles Darwin is Richard Dawkins, and with
good reason.
Dawson's works in genetics have been hugely beneficial to science, while his biting criticisms of creationism have sent fundamentalist heads spinning faster than a Black Sabbath greatest hits album.
Dawkins also unwittingly played a key role in the development of internet culture. In his 1976 work The Selfish Gene, Dawkins described shared cultural phenomena and practices with the term 'meme'.
Decades later, when searching for a term to describe a collection of jokes which spreads across the web, the term 'internet meme' was introduced. I guess it does sound better than 'crappy joke that irritating people re-hash over and over again'.
Iain Thomson: Dawkins's early work is everything good science writing should be: elegant, succinct and utterly persuasive. He's done a huge amount to make evolution understandable
The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker and Climbing Mount Improbable are masterpieces of their genre and have done much to increase the public understanding of science and evidential processes.
However, it is his writing on science and religion that have gained him notoriety among some sections of the population in more recent years.
The God Delusion was a multimillion bestseller and has earned him praise and condemnation for his militant atheism. As a non-believer myself I can't help feeling he crosses a line into fundamental atheism at times; no-one likes to be called a fool and Dawkins can be very stupid with his cleverness at times.
1.
Stephen Hawking
Iain Thomson: Hawking really wasn't my first choice to be
honest. I mean, who's actually finished A Brief History of Time and
actually felt they understood it?
I asked this of Shaun and he admitted that he'd certainly started it. I've finished it, and read the pass notes and simple version and I still don't feel I've understood it all. So why the great writer status?
Well, I don't think you can blame him for the subject matter being incredibly difficult to understand. He's dealing in concepts that are so huge, and require so many internal data points, that there's probably only a few thousand people in the world who can properly grasp everything that he talks about.
But he inspired millions to give it a go and there's already a generation of young scientists inspired by his writing making guesses of their own.
Hawking's achievements are all the more remarkable because of his disability. Unable to speak normally since a tracheotomy in 1985, Hawking has instead relied on computer technology to get his message across.
His famous synthetic voice has become one of the most famous on the planet, and there aren't any other physicists I can think of who have had a star turn on The Simpsons.
Shaun Nichols: Apparently I'm not the only one who digs The Hawk. The book was a best seller for 237 straight weeks. Granted, more than a few of those copies were bought to place on a book shelf and make the owner look smart, but I digress.
Hawking is brilliant at communicating his ideas with the written word, partially by necessity. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has left him unable to speak for a large portion of his life.
A Brief History of Time may not be the easiest read, but seeing as it is describing advanced astrophysics and cutting-edge theory, that Hawking could make it even remotely comprehensible is a testament to his writing style.
And the man did not stop there. He has written a number of other books, and recently launched a new programme for the Discovery channel mixing his explanations of physics and his own thoughts and opinions on the universe. We hope he'll be doing this for a long time to come.
Latest stories from Communications
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Python Developer / Python Django Team Leader London 55k...
Java Architect / Application Architect London 70k...
SQL Server Developer SQL Server Banking SQL Server...
User Interface Developer / UI Developer / User interface...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Scientists v writers
You were only ever going to attract flak with this list, but I have to agree with the previous correspondent that you have confused scientists with science and technology writers. As you rightly point out, publishing is essential to science, so each great scientific discovery is published, usually in the name of the genius that made it. I think this list is worth re-doing, leaving out the scientists, ie those whose primary occupation is discovery, to make more room for those whose primary activity is the explanatiion of discoveries. Popular science is bedevilled with poor writing stemming from confused thinking by hacks who don't have the time or intelligence to investigate what they are reporting (present company excepted, Iain & Saun). For example, the popular press obsession with dividing all substances on Earth into those that cause cancer and those that prevent it. Worthy of an honourable mention in that respect, imho, is Ben Goldacre, whose myth-busting Bad Science columns do much to rubbish such drivel.
Posted by: Sidney Risto 06 May 2010
You are such n00bz.
A list of top science and technology writers that doesn't include Donald Knuth? Weak sauce. I like Schneier a great deal, but I've turned to Knuth's work at least two orders of magnitude more often.
Posted by: Erik Carlseen 06 May 2010
and where is Carl Sagan
I can't believe you missed Carl Sagan. The man who inspired a generation with the meaning of the Cosmos. The man was so smooth, knew everything and you really felt you understood it all when he spoke. A great genius who sadly will be missed for eternity.
Posted by: Nick 05 May 2010
As usual...
You have ignored Roger Bacon. Not to be confused with Francis Bacon (around 1580), Roger was working around 1240. Single-handedly, he invented the concept of Science. He proposed setting up a group of research Universities utilising maths and the Scientific Method (which he had invented) to make discoveries for the benefit of humanity. All this, and a set of staggeringly accurate predictions of what could be achieved were laid out in a series of theses addressed to the Pope. And now we do not even remember his name...
Posted by: dodgy geezer 05 May 2010
Idiot
Dan "Lyin" Lyons on your list? Someone (when he wasn't trying to be funny) never let facts get in his way? You've lost my respect.
Posted by: slap 04 May 2010
Where is leonardo da vinci in this list?
Granted, he may not have written a best seller but there are lots of documentation around describing his research and inventions. He was without a doubt a genius and a mention would have been nice.
Posted by: Kev 04 May 2010
Ludicrous list
If it's a list of writers, then stick to writers. If it's a list of scientists, then stick to scientists. Don't confuse the two. Some of these scientists did not make science understandable through their writing. They introduced the science and others had to make it understandable to the masses. Writers like James Gleick or Timothy Ferris make science understandable and accessible. Newton, for example, was hardly a shining of example of a science writer. What we know of Newtonian physics comes from that others have written - Newton's Principia is a very tough slog at best. Newton did not coin the "standing on the shoulders of giants" statement. It was a common analogy that significantly predates Newton. Furthermore, it was not some great statement of his accomplishments - it was a dig at his rival Hooke. In a letter to Hooke, Newton stated his accomplishments resulted from standing on giants; Hooke was a very short man. A modicum of research on your part before throwing this list together would have been useful.
Posted by: Lucas Addington 04 May 2010