21 Jun 2001
A bug has been discovered in the Solaris operating system that may allow a remote attacker to execute malicious code at super-user level.
The remote buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in the Solaris Print Protocol daemon and may allow a remote or local attacker to crash the daemon or execute arbitrary code with super-user privilege. The daemon runs with root privileges by default on all current versions of Solaris.
Security firm ISS X-Force released an advisory describing the threat. "Solaris installs the in.lpd line printer software by default," it said. "This vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands without restriction. No local access to the target system is required to exploit this vulnerability."
The print protocol daemon provides an interface for remote users to interact with a local printer, listening for requests on port 515. A flaw in the 'transfer job' routine would allow for the execution of malicious code.
Sun Microsystems is working on a patch for the problem and said it will be available in July. In the meantime, users can disable the in.lpd line printer software. The X-Force advisory is available here.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Development Manager / PHP Developer / MySQL / LAMP...
Process Expert for Information/Content Management...
SQL Server / SSIS / ETL / T-SQL Data Migration A...
Linux Systems Administrator / Linux CentOS / Network...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?