08 Jul 2003
The code used to write the Apache web server is no better than many of its commercial rivals', a new report has claimed.
In recent tests, software inspection firm Reasoning concluded that the much-touted Apache had as many weaknesses in its code as its rivals, contradicting claims made by its community of open source developers.
Reasoning, which inspected the code of the V2.1 Apache open source web server, found that it had a similar defect density compared to several commercial equivalents.
In the study, the company found 31 software defects in 58,944 lines of source code of the Apache http server V2.1.
Defect density, defined as the number of defects found per thousand lines of source code, is considered to be a key reliability indicator.
The Apache code inspected scored 0.53 per thousand lines of source code, while the commercial average defect density came to 0.51 per thousand.
A similar study in February by Reasoning concluded that open source had a significantly lower defect density than commercial equivalents.
The new findings suggest that, as software applications mature, there is a correlation between code inspection, or peer review, and defect density.
The Reasoning report can be found here.
Latest stories from Software
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Skills: Open Source, C, C++, Java, Python, SQL, Developer...
ActionScript 3, Flex, Javascript, HTML, CSS, XML My...
My client is a real-time advertising and content 'start...
C++, UNIX, Multithreading My client is a leading software...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?