23 May 2007
Intel has been accused of trying to undermine efforts to produce a $100 laptop for developing countries by selling a product below cost to drive its rival out of the market.
Professor Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative, said that Intel's Classmate PC is being sold cheaply to hit sales of his XO laptop.
Negroponte expected orders to have reached three million by now and blamed the shortfall on Intel's tactics.
"The OLPC concept has received a lot of criticism and yet after that criticism [Intel is] either copying it or doing things perfectly in line with the concept. Intel should be ashamed of itself. It is just shameless," he told CBS.
Negroponte believes that his decision to base the OLPC on an AMD, rather than Intel, CPU is the root cause of the chip giant's actions.
He accused Intel of distributing literature to governments that heavily criticises the OLPC approach, pointing to the Classmate PC as a better alternative.
Intel chairman Craig Barrett denied the claims, telling CBS that Negroponte's assertions were crazy.
"We are not trying to drive him out of business. We are trying to bring capability to young people," he said.
Barrett maintained that Intel's literature was produced because "someone at Intel was comparing the Classmate PC with another device being offered in the marketplace. That is the way our business works."
Countries have until the end of May to place orders for the OLPC laptops, which are sold in batches of 250,000.
They sell for $176 each, although Negroponte hopes to get this down to $100 once he can reach mass production. Intel's Classmate PC sells for $200 but, again, the company plans to drive down the price.
Negroponte has been working on the OLPC laptop, which is designed to withstand harsh conditions and can be dropped in water, for the past two years.
As well using an AMD processor, the devices runs Red Hat's Linux operating system and AbiWord word processing software. It has wireless functionality and comes with a built-in webcam.
Negroponte's aim is to provide children in the world's poorest countries with the means to help improve their education.
Latest stories from Hardware
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Low Latency Network Engineer, Senior Network Engineer...
SQL DBA - (North London) North London , £45k - 50k...
Business Architect – (North London) £65,000 – 75,000k...
Graduate Software Engineer - Javascript OR Android...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Is it Microsux?
Here we go with another scumbag with 90%-plus of the competitioncrapping on another organisation. Notice I didn't say company, bcoz this bunch are out there doing the poorest of the poor a favour. What does poor little Intel do about it? It craps on them in just the way some sleazy mafiosa character beats up his honest competitor. Intel, you are no better than Microsux & are the mould on the shedded skin of a snake's underbelly.
Posted by: Rex Alfie Lee 05 Nov 2007
Shameless profits
Intel is in business to make money and if they can do it selling $200.00 classmate PC's then more power to them. Seems kind of self rightous to complain about Intel's sales when you are in competion with them by using the AMD processors instead. Providing a better product at a lower cost has always been a way to make the sale. Maybe this Prof. Negroponte needs to go back to the classroom or as least take a course on economics 101.
Posted by: Carl Schattke 23 May 2007
OLPC vs. Intel
You fail to point out that OLPC is non-profit and has committed to pass on every price point of savings that come through volume production to the countries buying the machine. Intel's machine is priced at a loss, and is being dumped in a predatory way to kill off the OLPC machine, whereon you will see the whole Intel approach change. Barrett's comment on the way business is done was the most revealing, as to OLPC it's not a business at all, but a not for profit educational project, and the laptop is simply the pencil that goes with the book.
Posted by: Jerry Goldstein 23 May 2007