12 Jul 2001
A European committee has backed down on plans to outlaw spam in favour of a more lenient approach, a move that is expected to upset anti-spam campaigners.
The European Parliament said yesterday that a civil liberties committee assembled to investigate spam in Europe had decided on the more lenient "opt-in or opt-out" approach rather than the all-out ban that anti-spam advocates had hoped for.
The decision goes against the grain of proposals from European telecom ministers in June, who lobbied for an opt-in only legislation in which recipients are required to give permission before any automatic emails can be sent.
But the somewhat weak stance taken by the Citizens' Rights and Freedoms, Justice and Home Affairs Committee means that these proposals have been canned.
One anti-spam campaigner, the European Internet Service Providers Association, said with disappointment that by taking a weak stance on consumer protection regarding spam, the Euro Parliament could damage its own credibility for dealing with data retention.
This is a separate affair concerned with a European strategy on a cybercrime crackdown by forcing ISPs to hang on to user data for longer.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Development Manager / PHP Developer / MySQL / LAMP...
Process Expert for Information/Content Management...
SQL Server / SSIS / ETL / T-SQL Data Migration A...
Linux Systems Administrator / Linux CentOS / Network...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?