21 Dec 2006
While in 2006 security researchers proved that Apple's operating system can be every bit as vulnerable to exploits as any other OS, malware authors and attackers have shown little interest in targeting Mac OS flaws.
Dave Marcus, security research and communications manager at McAfee, told vnunet.com that attackers looking to build large botnets and collect personal information seem to prefer going after the "low-hanging fruit".
Attackers focused on Windows vulnerabilities that would effect the overwhelming majority of personal computers as opposed to Mac vulnerabilities that would yield a far smaller pool of potential victims.
"Targets of opportunity are a big deal," said Marcus. "It doesn't benefit the malware author to go after the smaller operating systems."
As the Mac OS continues to pick up market share, however, it stands to reason that malware authors will pay more attention.
Alfred Huger, senior director of development at Symantec Security Response, told vnunet.com that Apple's switch to Intel processors will provide even more ammunition for attackers.
"I think you will see significant increases because there is so much boilerplate for x86 buffer overflows," he said, referring to the memory errors often used to give attackers access to a system.
Attackers are also becoming much more focused, targeting specific applications and systems rather than trying to infect as many systems as possible with one attack, said Huger.
The watershed where a widespread epidemic sweeps through the Mac OS world may never come, according to Huger.
"I don't think there's going to be a particular demarcation point," said the researcher, who suggests instead that the Mac OS security "wake-up call" will come through a series of individual lessons learned from targeted attacks rather than a single catastrophic event.
2006 was predicted to be the year of the great Mac OS security awakening, a time when the virus epidemics and malware headaches that plagued Windows would finally cross over to Apple.
As the year ends, that massive attack has yet to come, and it possibly may never come.
The vulnerabilities, however, are out there, and if the security experts are correct, the flood of Mac OS threats may transform from a looming wave of one piece of malware to a slow seep of small, targeted threats that users may never see coming.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Development Manager / PHP Developer / MySQL / LAMP...
Process Expert for Information/Content Management...
SQL Server / SSIS / ETL / T-SQL Data Migration A...
Linux Systems Administrator / Linux CentOS / Network...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
In Symantec & McAffee Labs, OSX is Dangerous
Strange, outside of lab conditions - outside of labs at TWO virus protection companies, there are ZERO viruses or problems. I think the only warning OSX users should heed is do not going into their labs, log on as root, hand over your machine and come back in a week or two ... well, maybe 6 weeks. By then, your mAc might be vulnerable.
Posted by: jbelkin 21 Dec 2006
Secure thoughts...
It's hard to take these security firms seriously when they make money by instilling fear into the minds of computer users. Notice how they keep changing their tune when coming up with the latest reason for OS X's lack of real world attacks. I'm certainly not naive enough to think that OS X is bullet-proof but the fact remains that it (for whatever reason) is not experiencing anything like the attacks and malware Windows suffers every day. One would think that given the perceived "smugness" that the security firms see in OS X users that someone, somewhere, would release a really nasty beast to teach OS X users a lesson. The vitriol one sees in various forums against Mac users gives rise to the question "Why hasn't someone just gone ahead and done it by now?" With that thought in mind it makes more sense to think that OS X is really a harder nut to crack than the security people say as well as its relative lower market share.
Posted by: Lawrence A. Krupp 21 Dec 2006