21 Dec 2006
2006 had all the makings of a landmark year for Mac OS security. The first OS X viruses surfaced in the wild, gaping security holes were revealed, and analysts gave dire warnings about the possibilities for a security epidemic.
And all of this was among a group of users famous for seldom needing any security software at all.
As the year came to a close, however, the epidemic that would infect thousands of systems and strike fear into the hearts of Mac users everywhere had yet to materialise.
Malware authors had largely ignored the Mac in favour of the much larger and easily controlled pools of unpatched Windows systems.
Viruses failed to spread substantially in the wild, and the occasional Apple update did enough to keep most Mac users secure.
The year started off with the discovery of a virus that would become the first of many predicted 'wake-up calls' for Mac users in 2006.
The Leap-A virus first appeared in February disguised as a collection of photos of Apple's upcoming Leopard operating system labelled 'latestpics.tgz'. Experts soon diagnosed the file as the first verified Mac OS X virus.
Leap-A, which used Apple's iChat software, spread via social engineering, and the user had to be tricked into giving permission for the installation.
The virus had no intentional adverse effect on a host machine, although an error in the code could prevent infected applications from running.
While Leap-A posed little threat of spreading widely or causing any damage, security experts claimed that it would act as a warning salvo to Mac users and convince them that security threats did exist for the Mac OS.
"Some owners of Mac computers have held the belief that Mac OS X is incapable of harbouring computer viruses, but Leap-A will leave them shell-shocked as it shows that the malware threat on Mac OS X is real," predicted Sophos senior technology consultant Graham Cluley when the Leap-A reports first surfaced.
By March, however, fewer than 50 Leap-A infections had been recorded by Symantec and the idea that 'Macs don't get viruses' remained strong, even in the eyes of Apple.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
We have been given the privilege of recruiting for a...
My client is a proprietary, electronic trading firm and...
Our client is looking for a Senior Project Manager (Telecoms...
Business Analysts are being sought by my leading financial...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
In Symantec & McAffee Labs, OSX is Dangerous
Strange, outside of lab conditions - outside of labs at TWO virus protection companies, there are ZERO viruses or problems. I think the only warning OSX users should heed is do not going into their labs, log on as root, hand over your machine and come back in a week or two ... well, maybe 6 weeks. By then, your mAc might be vulnerable.
Posted by: jbelkin 21 Dec 2006
Secure thoughts...
It's hard to take these security firms seriously when they make money by instilling fear into the minds of computer users. Notice how they keep changing their tune when coming up with the latest reason for OS X's lack of real world attacks. I'm certainly not naive enough to think that OS X is bullet-proof but the fact remains that it (for whatever reason) is not experiencing anything like the attacks and malware Windows suffers every day. One would think that given the perceived "smugness" that the security firms see in OS X users that someone, somewhere, would release a really nasty beast to teach OS X users a lesson. The vitriol one sees in various forums against Mac users gives rise to the question "Why hasn't someone just gone ahead and done it by now?" With that thought in mind it makes more sense to think that OS X is really a harder nut to crack than the security people say as well as its relative lower market share.
Posted by: Lawrence A. Krupp 21 Dec 2006