25 Aug 2008
A single email has cost the University of Salford £110,000 after it alleged fraud in an expenses claim.
Dr Tom McMaster, a lecturer in business management at Salford University, submitted an expense claim of £180 after receiving permission to sail his boat to a conference in Galway rather than fly.
However, after submitting his claim he received a response from the accounts department:
"Clearly the original claim was an attempted fraud and appropriately rejected.”
"Those who submitted and certified it should be ashamed of themselves."
However, the email was also sent to other members of his department and as a result constituted libel.
McMaster took the case to the High Court to clear his name. After failing to have the case dismissed, the university settled out of court for £10,000 but will have to pay up to £100,000 in costs.
A spokeswoman for Salford University said: "The university has reached a settlement with Dr McMaster and we cannot comment on any outstanding grievance issues concerning him."
The case highlights the importance of following correct email procedure and the vulnerability of organisations to action if it is not followed.
Had the email been sent solely to Dr. McMaster there would have been no case to answer, but by distributing it to others the organisation opened itself up to libel action.
Latest stories from Management
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Java / J2EE analyst programmer with experience of building...
Crystal Reports Developer London or Dublin £340 per day...
Our client is a major Broadcasting company seeking a...
Support Engineer required to work for leading Online...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Serves them right
I hope the person responsible for this nonsense was chastised? As an accountant, they should be held liable for incurring costs on behalf of the university. It is somewhat ironic that an incompetent accountant who couldn't be bothered to check their facts cost the university almost 1000 times more than it would have it they had bothered to THINK. But my personal experience with these nitwits is that accountants don't think, they just needlessly cost organisations many thousands by being penny wise and pound foolish. As happened here.
Posted by: Marc 26 Aug 2008