06 May 2009
The European Union has called for the US to hand over control of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) to an independent body.
EU information society commissioner Viviane Reding said that the current system, under which Icann is run by the US Department of Commerce, is unsustainable, and that the organisation, which assigns internet addresses, needs to be free of control by one nation.
"At the moment, the US government is the only body exercising some oversight over Icann. I believe that the US, so far, has done this in a reasonable manner, " Reding said in her weekly internet address.
"In the long run, it is not defendable that the government department of only one country has oversight of an internet function which is used by hundreds of millions of people in countries all over the world."
The current agreement between Icann and the Department of Commerce runs out on 30 September, which the commissioner described as the "moment of truth".
Reding favours a fully privatised and accountable Icann which would be subject to review by an international tribunal, not just the California courts where the organisation is based.
Governments would be able to make recommendations to Icann by setting up a 'G-12 for internet governance' group, which would comprise two representatives from North America, South America, Europe and Africa, three representatives from Asia and Australia, as well as a chairman as a non-voting member.
The EU will begin discussing the case this week, and Reding hopes that president Obama will take these views into consideration.
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...
Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...
Roc Search is currently recruiting for an Infrastructure...
Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Excellant idea!
I believe that this is an excellant idea! The US shouldn't have sole oversight on something this global.Eastern Asia should have three representatives, after all they have over 1/3 of the worlds' population on that side of the globe! The only thing that troubles me is the appointment or election of some sleeper terrorist into this organization. STRICT security background checks would have to be implemented. In theory, this is a good idea; in practice, this will need some close scrutiny.
Posted by: Kurt Bushre 05 Jun 2009
Internet G12?
What a horrible idea. It IS an historical oddity that the internet having been invented in the US with a lot of the original work having been funded by DARPA is the only country in a position to have a say in what ICANN does. BUT it is no accident that ICANN should have operated the way it has as it is in a country with a strongly enforced constitutional guarentee of free speech. Do we really want the Chinese government to have a role in internet governance?
Posted by: David Barry 07 May 2009
Not just ICANN but .COM too!
Pretty much every country worldwide could register a .COM domain but as things stand it seems the USA appears to "control" the lot. Some travel firm had their domain "confiscated" because the travel firm did trips to Cuba. It wasn't hosted in the USA, it wasn't even wanting to have US citiszens as customers, but because it was registered through a US firm (and Verisign/Network Solutions is in the USA, it could be "knobbled"). ICANN and .COM etc (not .US) are just two examples where management and regulation ought to be independent of any single country... like he UN (but we know how the USA considered the UN - they'd consider going it alone if the UN wasn't doing what they wanted!)
Posted by: NetGuy 07 May 2009
If it isn't broke
This comes down to this "If it isn't broke fix it." What is it with government types always wanting to fix things that aren't broken?
Posted by: Fedup 06 May 2009