19 Jun 2007
The British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) has banned its first computer game in over 10 years.
Manhunt 2 was deemed too violent for sale because its "unrelenting focus on stalking and brutal slaying" would be likely to cause harm to those playing it, according to one BBFC member.
"Manhunt 2 is distinguishable from recent high-end video games by its unremitting bleakness and callousness of tone in an overall game context which constantly encourages visceral killing with exceptionally little alleviation or distancing," David Cooke, director of the BBFC, told The Daily Telegraph.
"There is sustained and cumulative casual sadism in the way in which these killings are committed, and encouraged, in the game."
Manhunt 2 concerns a corrupt businessman who spirits prisoners into a town and films them killing gang members to make snuff films. Players get extra points for more gruesome killings.
The game was withdrawn from sale in Dixons and other shops after it was implicated in the killing of Leicester teenager Stefan Pakeerah by Warren LeBlanc.
Police said later that the game was not a factor since LeBlanc had never played it, and a copy was found in Pakeerah's bedroom.
This is the first time that the BBFC has banned a computer game since the launch of Carmageddon in 1997.
Carmageddon awarded points for running down passers-by and additional points for a large number of simultaneous kills. The ban was later overturned on appeal.
Manhunt 2 was developed by Rockstar Games, which also produces the controversial Grand Theft Auto series. The ban is expected to lead to a significant rise in demand on internet auction sites.
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Onsite IT Support Technician / Manager - Leek - circa...
Lead Infrastructure Engineer (Microsoft) – Hosted Services...
Hi Greetings, Job Title : Business Analyst Location...
Magento Senior Developer, London : Magento / PHP / CSS...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Here comes the backlash
Get ready for it - the games industry has had it good for a long time. So many titles have crept under the radar of censors, all the time pushing the boundaries of what is acceptable. Simply slapping an 18 certificate on a game is not enough to stop those who REALLY shouldn't play these games gaining access. A movie lasts for around 2 hours, and even the most slaughter heavy have some form of narrative. A game lasts a hell of a lot longer, with the ability to rerun, recreate and recommit violence in a myriad of styles, again and again and again. If some people can be influenced by a 2 hour movie about global warming or 9/11, then maybe (I say maybe) there are individuals out there who will be just as influenced by games in which strangulation with a carrier bag is one of the options available to them to dispose of enemies. I would make abet that some kid, somewhere will play the game and try the exact same technique on someone but I feel my money is safe. Books also contain horrendous events, but with literature you can close it, look up, break the concentration if you want. Video games are different - the intensity and addictive quality are far greater than previous forms of media. Of course, 99.9% of us might play the game in an ironic 'Tarantino homage style' with a wry grin on our faces, but responsibility for the influence of media has to be considered.
Posted by: rick 20 Jun 2007
How absolutely ridiculous!
Thanks BBFC for trying to stop me from becoming a mass murderer. It's too late though, I have already seen Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2, American Chainsaw Massacre, Scream and American Psycho, although I must admit they were chock full of non killing related in depth storyline and social comment.
Posted by: Lee Ramsbottom 19 Jun 2007
Damn Censors
This is a total waste of time. people are still going to play manhunt2 in the UK. They will just have to import it. Thats what i am going to do. This government is far to controlling. All the BBFC have to do is increase the toughness of the ratings. also need to make providing ID for purchase a standard. How in the hell!!! can a computer game harm the player? (maybe if they accidently poke themselves in the eye with the case). The BBFC does not know what they are talking about. This whole thing annoys me, i love computer games and have played them since i was able to. violent video games DO NOT make you a violent person!!!. They are for entertainment and people who cant differenciate from a game and reality should be banned from playing everything except PacMan!. Gamers Rule!!!
Posted by: Chris 19 Jun 2007
Poor research
This article display such poor research. The plot described is that of Manhunt not Manhunt 2. Please.
Posted by: Paul Ryan 19 Jun 2007
UK censor bans first game in 10 years
Hope they lock up the person that tested it for the BBFC before he kills, although hang on I played manhunt over a year ago and have not killed, and if it had upset me I would have turned it off, yes the game might be a bit sick that?s why it should be rated 18. It looks to me just because the first game caused controversy the BBFC wants to look like its doing a job.
Posted by: Darren 19 Jun 2007