05 May 2006
A new report from US security firm McAfee has suggested that Apple users are complacent about security.
McAfee's Avert Labs said that Macintosh platform vulnerability discovery rates have increased by 228 per cent in the past three years alone, from 45 in 2003 to 143 in 2005, compared to Microsoft's products which saw only a 73 per cent increase.
The report also warns that these vulnerabilities are now being exploited with the same speed and efficiency as PC vulnerabilities.
"Many believe that using an Apple operating system is a form of security in itself, believing that they are far less susceptible to malware than Windows users," said Stuart McClure, senior vice president for global threats at McAfee.
"And while the threats targeting the Mac operating system are low in volume, the use of Apple products does not provide an invisibility cloak from malware.
"Users need to be more vigilant about security as adoption rates soar and attacks on Apple operating systems increase."
McClure also believes that Apple's success with consumer products and its resulting higher profile will entice security researchers and hackers to target Mac OS and other Apple products, such as iTunes and iPods.
Geoff Coats, a graphic designer at New Orleans design firm Zande Newman, admitted that he chose Apple and its Mac OS X because he believed it to be more secure than Windows.
"My experience, and that of many other small to medium sized businesses, has taught me that Apple delivers a much more secure computing environment," he said.
"However, I've recently realised that it might be time to re-evaluate that assumption and begin protecting my Mac from outside threats."
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Business Analyst urgently required with a background...
We have an opportunity for an experienced Business Architect...
Leading Institutional Investment Manager require an individual...
Leading Institutional Fund Manager require a Senior IT...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Salesmanship
All you have to do is consider the source. Of course they're going to bend the truth a little. They'll make money in the long run. There's no shame in that, that's just salesmanship. If you're gonna blame someone, blame the news reporting agencies. It's shameful that they would post this as news without researching both sides. Basically, it's an ad for security software.
Posted by: Mike Manzano 09 May 2006
Name one
Name one actual virus or spyware that has brought down a Mac, just one I dare ya...
Posted by: Psuedo-News Sucks 05 May 2006
lets do the math
I love these, no validity stories. So if you go from 0 to 2, you have a 200% increase in security vulnerabilities? Yeah I can see that, it kinda makes sense. But instead of running stories like this, with an obvious bias and comments form a company VP who makes LOADS of money off of "Protecting US" from all these so-called malware, you should actually put some actual facts in it. For starters, name one virus that actually does a damn thing to Mac OS X, that doesn't have to be installed by the user who knows the password to the machine (LEAP-A), or that hasn't already been patched for over a year before the virus even came out(The Bluetooth One). You can't, there isn't one. And that's not cause Mac OS X is better than Windows (Even though this person here truly believes it is), it's because UNIX is a better architecture than Windows and Mac OS X runs on top of UNIX giving it the HUGE edge over Windows. You know why stories like this run, because PC people are jealous. Well that's not really true, but they should be. They run with stories like this, because fear makes people pay attention, and when people pay attention, the media makes out because then it can make money. How, I don't know, Advertising on the Web site I guess. But scaring people with big number like "228%" makes for a better story than, "Mac OS X has 2 whole virus, BOTH DO NOTHING!!!!" But at least mine actually portrays the truth.
Posted by: Robert D. 05 May 2006