18 Oct 2005
Microsoft's national technology officer has attacked the UK government's plans for a centralised database supporting the proposed national ID card scheme.
Jerry Fishenden told vnunet.com that current plans for a centralised database with large amounts of information on each person are a mistake, and could lead to "massive identity fraud".
He went on to criticise the IT industry for not clearly voicing the real concerns.
"It is unnecessary to build a system with all the data in one place," he said. "The Home Office should be basing the design on the knowledge that any system of that size will be breached, most likely by criminal gangs with huge resources."
When asked why he was making such statements on the day the Commons voted on the ID Card Bill, Fishenden said only that the IT industry had so far not been getting its views across properly.
"When we attend meetings with the Home Office I have noticed that industry representatives do not voice their concerns very much. Only outside the meetings do you hear their concerns," he explained.
Fishenden pulls no punches concerning the industry's lack of input so far. " I do not think that the IT industry has been coherent and consistent enough about the way the ID card system is conceived," he said.
"Any ID system needs only to keep information that is appropriate to a particular search in one location. That way you reduce the impact of loss or theft by decentralising the data."
Part of the problem could be because the Home Office liaises with a number of IT industry groups, notably Eurim, Intellect and the British Computer Society (BCS).
Fishenden maintained that his views are supported by the BCS, which has made similar representations to the Home Office.
"The IT industry needs to find a language in relation to privacy and identity to talk to the wider community," said Fishenden.
Critics may see the attack as a means of pulling the programme more in the direction of Microsoft's view of IT systems.
Fishenden sees no conflict of interest in saying that "decentralised IT is part of Microsoft's philosophy. It's all part of our shared services agenda."
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Systems Analyst - Project Lead - Chelmsford, Essex...
Windows Systems Engineer (Windows Log File, Syslog) learn...
Role: MVC PHP Developer Location: London, Central...
Title: Senior Web Developer / Engineer (HTML, JavaScript...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
A rather large honey pot!
The ID card system, will be a huge honey pot of information to anyone who wants the information. No system in the world is full proof, I thought that is why we have seperate passport, driving license, national insurance numbers. That would be three different systems to break into to gain the information, where as one sytem to break to gain all the information....
Posted by: M.e 19 Oct 2005
database will be easy to break into
There will be much more ID fraud when the ID cards are issued. As a disabled person I make sure all private and personal documents are always shredded when I've finished with them I've had my mobile phone stolen and I can replace that but replacing all the info on it I can't. This database has to be 110% hacker proof or it won't work. The ID's in the database have to be guaranteed to be 110% secure or nobody will feel secure with the knowledge of the possiblity of just about anyone can & will break into the computer database.
Posted by: Anne 18 Oct 2005