All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Bug reporting process open to infection

by James Middleton

01 Mar 2001

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

Security experts are calling for a set of guiding principles to formalise the process of reporting security vulnerabilities, claiming that in the "real world" the whole process is liable to failure.

According to a report in the latest Internet Security Conference Newsletter, authored by Ivan Arce, founder and chairman of security group Core-SDI, there are numerous "bugs in the bug reporting process".

Discoverers of bugs in software and hardware often do not have the skill or time to research the problem, making it difficult to determine if the problem actually exists, or if it is specific to the discoverer, said Arce.

Nor does the discoverer have the resources to assist the process of identifying the problem, leading to vendors being late in addressing problems due to lack of interest or resources.

There is also a noticeable lack of communication between discoverer and vendor, either because the discoverer goes directly to the forum publishing stage, or because the vendor is not responsive. Several discoverers or several vendors addressing a problem often leads to lack of co-ordination and leakage of vulnerabilities before a fix is available, leaving users vulnerable, Arce warned.

He pointed to several security bugs problems discovered by himself and other security experts at the SafeNet security conference held at the end of last year. Although these bugs were discovered more than two months ago, solutions are still few and far between.

Arce said he believed that 'proxies', individuals or groups that take responsibility for publicising vulnerabilities on behalf of the discoverer, would be helpful in co-ordinating communication and could even go some way to researching the bug. But as Arce points out, "this effort is in its infancy" and needs some serious work.

Until then, Core-SDI has issued a set of guidelines, labelled as 'A feeble attempt at improving the process', until security experts can either agree on or set out formal guidelines for bug reporting.

Arce's full report and Core SDI's guidelines can be found here.

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

35%

0%

11%

54%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Lead PHP Developer - Technical Architect - Ecommerce Manager

Lead PHP Developer - Technical Architect - Ecommerce...

C# / .NET Software Engineers – Leeds City Centre – C# (£30-50k)

C# Software Engineers required to join rapidly expanding...

Java / J2EE Developers – Leeds City Centre – Java / J2EE (£30-50k)

Java / J2EE Software Engineers required to join rapidly...

Developer (MIS - SQL / T-SQL, HTML, CSS or Javascript)

Developer (MIS / Business Systems - SQL / T-SQL, HTML...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.