28 Sep 2010
The open source community behind the free OpenOffice productivity suite has outlined plans to distance itself from Oracle with the creation of an independent Document Foundation.
The strategy involves rebranding and restructuring, along with the launch of a vendor-independent software suite called LibreOffice that will feature Open Document Format support and require no copyright assignment.
The Document Foundation has received support from almost the entire OpenOffice programming community, including Novell, Red Hat and Google, leaving only Oracle with the original OpenOffice repository.
The Foundation said that it had invited Oracle to become a member of the new organisation, and to donate the brand it acquired with Sun Microsystems 18 months ago.
Pending this decision, the LibreOffice brand will be used to refer to the Document Foundation's software development efforts.
"We believe that the Foundation liberates the development of the code and the evolution of the project from the constraints represented by the commercial interests of a single company," said Sophie Gautier, a community veteran and former maintainer of OpenOffice.org's French language project.
Richard Stallman, president of the Free Software Foundation, pointed out that the decision will enable the Document Foundation to avoid recommending proprietary add-ons.
"They are the main freedom problem of the current OpenOffice.org," he said. "I hope that the LibreOffice developers and the Oracle-employed developers of OpenOffice will be able to co-operate on development of the body of the code."
Guy Lunardi, product management director at Novell, suggested that LibreOffice could do for the office productivity market what Mozilla's Firefox has done for browsers.
"Viva la LibreOffice," he said. "We look forward to working with the Document Foundation to help develop a solid open source document software offering."
Mark Shuttleworth, founder and major shareholder of Canonical, the maker of Ubuntu, added: "The Document Foundation's stewardship of LibreOffice provides Ubuntu developers [with] an effective forum for collaboration around the code that makes Ubuntu a solution for the desktop in office environments."
Bob Tarzey, director of analyst firm Quocirca, told V3.co.uk that the announcement is a good test of Oracle's open source credentials.
"We will have to see whether Oracle is willing to relinquish control over the OpenOffice brand in the interests of the wider community," he said.
"Ultimately, if this new Foundation decides it's better off without Oracle, then it's probably best off doing the move to maintain its freedom and establish its independence on the software development front."
Oracle had not responded to requests for comment at the time of writing.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Start-up company in West London are looking for a number...
This team is responsible for developing and running carrier...
Graduate Mathematical Modelling position focused on research...
Working on real projects and real high performance software...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Stating the obvious...
"document interchangeability with Office only sort of works" Isn't this the entire point? Microsoft, as a provider of proprietary software, has no incentive to ensure interoperability or to use standardised open formats, even to the extent of actively working against them. Projects such as LibreOffice are in a position to push for adoption of these, which should eventually be to everyone's benefit.
Posted by: Dave L 02 Nov 2010
Financing
Simple question really: where is the money going to come from to support this?
Posted by: Jimmy 30 Sep 2010
It'll take some hard work
As an Open Office user, I'd like to point out that compared with MS Office it comes a very poor second. The document interchangeability with Office only sort of works - formatting problems between Word & Write even for simple documents and the macro language is impenetrable. Some really hard work is needed to bring it up to a fully industrial-strength office suite. A shame, as I'm a supporter of open software. But I'd only recommend it to people who just want to do the usual simple things with it and don't need Office compatibility. The former group is probably 90% of users. The latter is probably 10% (both numbers are guesses).
Posted by: Peter 29 Sep 2010