04 Mar 2010
The Chinese hackers who launched attacks on Google and over 30 other organisations last year were amateurs, according to botnet detection firm Damballa.
In a report entitled The Command Structure of the Aurora Botnet (PDF), the firm claims to have pieced together an "extensive timeline of the attack".
Damballa said that the attacks launched against Google and other firms can be traced back to July 2009, and that the compromised host computers were most prevalent in the US, China, Germany, Taiwan and the UK.
"There is evidence of multiple criminal operators involved, and that the botnet operators were of an amateur level," the report said.
"The botnet has a simple command topology and makes extensive use of Dynamic DNS CnC techniques. The construction of the botnet would be classed as 'old school', and is rarely used by professional botnet criminal operators today."
However, Damballa was quick to point out that, despite being amateurs, the attackers were still able to cause a worrying amount of damage.
"The results proved just as damaging as a sophisticated botnet, since the threat was not quickly identified and neutralised," the report said.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
IFW, Information FrameWork, IBM, Platform Expert, Architect...
Position: Software Development Manager Location: London...
EPOS Support Specialist - London / Waterloo / Lambeth...
An exciting opportunity has come up as a result of further...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?