All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Icann .com vote sparks registrar wrath

by William Eazel

02 Mar 2006

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this
The proposed settlement allows VeriSign to raise registration fees by seven per cent annually in four of the next six years
Domain name registrars have reacted angrily to Icann's approval of VeriSign's .com monopoly

The decision yesterday by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) to approve VeriSign's .com monopoly has sparked a storm of controversy among domain name registrars.

Domain registrar GoDaddy.com described itself as "outraged" by the vote. "The agreement grants VeriSign uncontested price increases and perpetual monopoly power, which will lead to exorbitant profits at the expense of the internet community," the company said.

The controversial revised agreement settles a long-term dispute between Icann and VeriSign, which operates the .com registry.

The settlement includes a new agreement relating to the operation of the .com registry, which still needs to be approved by the US Department of Commerce.

"If approved, this settlement will clear the way for a new and productive relationship between Icann and VeriSign, facilitating Icann's stewardship and technical coordination of the internet's domain name system," said Icann in a statement.

Icann's board voted 9 to 5 in favour of the agreements with one director abstaining.

The proposed settlement allows VeriSign to raise registration fees by seven per cent annually in four of the next six years.

It also gives VeriSign control of the .com registry indefinitely, as it extends VeriSign's "presumptive renewal" right when the proposed settlement agreement expires in 2012.

Bob Parsons, chief executive and founder of GoDaddy.com, said: "We are bitterly disappointed, but we're not giving up yet. It's simply a bad deal for the industry and registrants everywhere.

"The fact that this monopolistic deal was approved is a loud signal that major changes are needed at Icann."

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

36%

0%

10%

54%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Flash Developer- actionscript, AJAX, JSON

Flash Developer- Actionscript 3.0, AJAX, JSON, computer...

Business Analyst, Risk platform, Equity Derivs, Investment Bank

Business Analyst - Risk platform - Equity Derivatives...

Java Developer - Algorithmic Trading - Global Trading Business

Java Developer - Algorithmic Trading - Global Trading...

Junior Treasury Project Manager, Tier One Investment Bank

Junior Middle Office Project Manager, Treasury, IB...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.