13 Feb 2007
Microsoft is preparing to launch the next generation of its Windows operating system by 2009.
Ben Fathi, corporate vice president of development at Microsoft, said at the RSA Security conference in San Francisco last week that the next Windows could take two and a half years to build, putting the final release at the end of 2009.
The launch could put Microsoft back on a release schedule that would see a major operating system launch every other year.
The company previously released new operating systems on a biennial basis, but took more than five years to develop Windows Vista.
Vista was delayed in part because Microsoft pulled engineering resources off the project to work on Windows XP Service Pack 2, an update that overhauled the operating system's security after a slew of attacks against the software.
Fathi suggested that the next version of Windows would contain some of the features that the company stripped from Windows Vista.
Microsoft pulled improvements including a new file system dubbed WinFS, the UEFI Bios replacement and a set of advanced security features from Vista to prevent further product delays.
The company is planning to add support for UEFI through a future update. Instead of implementing its new WinFS file system in its desktop operating system, Microsoft plans to integrate pieces of the technology into the SQL Server database, ActiveX Data Objects and other Microsoft products.
Microsoft has not spoken recently about what is left of its Next Generation Secure Computing Base strategy, which envisioned a bolted down, compartmentalised security structure that would automatically contain attacks.
Kevin Kutz, director of the Windows Client at Microsoft, said in an emailed statement that the company is not yet ready to provide guidance about the next Windows version.
Microsoft has scheduled a Professional Developer Conference in Los Angeles this Autumn.
The events for software developers occur only in years when Microsoft feels it has something new to talk about, and typically cover upcoming Windows versions.
Further details about the next Windows version also could be provided at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference this Spring.
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
We have been given the privilege of recruiting for a...
My client is a proprietary, electronic trading firm and...
Our client is looking for a Senior Project Manager (Telecoms...
Business Analysts are being sought by my leading financial...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Fair doos
I think Fredrick was a bit out of line with his comment. I know for a fact that microsoft spend alot of time on market research before adding most componants into their operating systems. Ok so they can't make everything perfect, you try writing an OS that has to run almost anything and everything computer related. They have to cater for the majority vote as they are a business. I like Vista for a fact, i've had it since the first beta was released and the following betas, and i wish people would give it a break in all honesty, yeah its a bit slow at times, its not compatible with every little third party cheap nick-nack the people buy, but people forget the security (which as a technician i like) and safety controls. I wanna hear a view about Vista that isn't what someones heard and repeated to sound like they know what they're talking about, i real view and opinion from someone whos properly used it. In all honesty, once Microsoft take out a few more of the bugs, then it'll be fine, i'm running SP1 and i haven't had a single problem yet, i'm sure there are problems, but the average user won't normally get them.
Posted by: Ash Kapow 27 Mar 2008
replace vista
replace vista, or 'visturd' as it is affectionately known? i wonder why? maybe microsoft will take their heads out of their *rses and actually ask people how they use their computers, and what they do and don't like? oh no hold on we are talking about microsoft
Posted by: frederick 20 Mar 2008
how can I optimize Vista?
'tis a question, not a statement I make: How can I optimize vista without hardware or software? By optimize I mean to remove all unnecessary processes from bogging the computer down or overloading it.
Posted by: "Henry" 01 Jul 2007
Vista a Shell?
from sources I consider to be very reliable....Vista was designed to be a shell for future operating systems. I mean look at the sheer size difference between XP and Vista...it jumped from roughly 600mb to 3Gb....Now all Microsoft has to do is basically create add-in style releases and call them full versions essentially just adding to the functionality of Vista and slapping on a new sticker for the name...
Posted by: Zac 06 Jun 2007
Except...
That they already have half of the next version built under the covers in Vista, they just didn't finish it all.
Posted by: Stan 30 May 2007
**scheduled**
ya they said same thing about vista..but it just came out a half a month ago. it will be delayed
Posted by: andrew 15 Feb 2007