15 Oct 2007
BEA has turned down Oracle's $6.7bn acquisition offer, claiming that it undervalues the company.
"It is apparent to our board ... that BEA is worth substantially more to Oracle, to others and, importantly, to our shareholders than the price indicated in your letter," BEA president William Klein wrote in a letter to Oracle co-president Charles Philips.
Oracle is offering a 25 per cent premium over BEA's closing stock price on 11 October. But Klein believes that the valuation does not properly reflect the company's value.
"We believe that the absence of current financial information in the public markets limits investor visibility into our performance," he said, adding that BEA would disclose additional information in the near future.
BEA's stock price rose nearly 40 per cent on Friday, indicating that investors expect Oracle to raise its offer.
BEA specialises in middleware applications. Its flagship product is the AquaLogic application server, and the firm has been making a push into service oriented architectures. Oracle has a set of competing middleware applications.
Klein warned that the acquisition talks would have to be brief to minimise uncertainty among customers, and that he could only supply limited competitive information.
Latest stories from Developer
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Overview: My client; Based in the City...
**New Vacancy** Based in London Up to £35,000 - £42...
Junior BA The role of the junior BA is to support the...
Project Manager - Financial Services IT - up to £85'000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?