All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Whitehall blames suppliers for IT failures

by Gareth Morgan

02 Apr 2003

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

The future of the partnership approach to funding public sector IT projects is in "real danger" unless suppliers start delivering projects on time and on budget.

Government officials are dissatisfied with the number of IT projects that have failed, and are ready to consider alternative ways of funding programmes.

And having taken steps to improve its procurement processes, the government is less impressed with the response from suppliers.

Senior officials have even accused suppliers of lying about their capabilities in order to win contracts.

Speaking at the Strategic IT Partnerships in Government conference, Peter Gershon, chief executive at the Office of Government Commerce (OGC), warned that the government is tired of seeing public/private partnerships fail.

"There is little evidence that the IT industry has an understanding of what is needed to make these partnerships work," he said.

Gerson added that there is "a real danger" that public/private partnerships could be scrapped because of the perception in Whitehall that "naive public sector clients are being taken for a ride by contractors".

E-envoy Andrew Pinder indicated that poor project management within the public sector had caused a number of IT project failures, but that suppliers were also culpable.

"Some projects have failed because suppliers have lied about their capability and promised things they cannot deliver," he stated.

Previous failures, such as the Libra project to update magistrates' courts computer systems, could have been avoided by applying some simple management practices, according to Dr Tom Abram, chairman of modernising government at parliamentary lobby group, Eurim.

"There has been a fear that simple project management techniques won't work; that they don't seem appropriate for the scale of government projects. But I think this makes it worse," he explained.

Gershon said that the government intends to consider not only how it buys technology in the future, but whether IT can actually deliver business enhancements.

"Unless suppliers make it a hell of a lot easier to buy and implement IT, clients will become disaffected and will vote with their pockets," he warned.

The OGC has been developing frameworks for successful IT projects, introducing independent reviews throughout the procurement process, and assigning so-called Senior Responsible Owners charged with overseeing the work.

A guide for successful partnerships is due to be published imminently.

"But it is not sufficient to have just client-side reform," concluded Gershon. "Where do we see open admissions of industry's weakness and what they're doing to address it?"

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

25%

1%

12%

62%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Riso

Colour printing: why the bill keeps outstripping the budget

The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts

Qlikview

Magic quadrant for business intelligence platforms

Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?

MS CRM Support Analyst / Microsoft Dynamics Support Analyst - CRM

2nd & 3rd Line CRM Support Analyst / MS CRM Systsems...

Digital Insight Manager - Web Analytics

Digital Insight Manager, Hertfordshire, £28,000. An...

Enterprise / Solutions Architect - Technology Evangelist

Enterprise / Solutions Architect. Salary £60,000 - £90...

Business Intelligence Developer

Business Intelligence Developer - Leeds. Salary £35,000...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.