12 Jul 2007
Utility companies could be facing a hacking time bomb owing to poor security measures.
As more utilities move control and billing systems online an analyst has warned that hackers are increasingly turning their attention to the possibilities of controlling the systems.
While there is little direct financial benefit in breaking into such systems, there may be other benefits.
"The utility companies are moving to completely digital systems and security is not prioritised," said Fran Howarth, partner at analyst firm Hurwitz & Associates.
"Hackers could siphon off electricity for use in projects like indoor drug farms, for example, and charge it to consumers.
"The problem is that 80 to 90 per cent of the critical infrastructure is in private hands and they have their own security problems, so consumers are low down on the list."
Howarth warned that some critical infrastructure owners are even neglecting physical security, particularly in the US.
The increase in political hacking means that companies that own sections of critical infrastructure need to be aware of the need for greater security infrastructure.
Latest stories from Networks
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Support Analyst x 1/2 Skills: Apple Mac OSX, Windows...
Network Consultant - London - 55-65k My client are...
A leading global provider of critical information to...
Playstations and table football in the kitchen? Standard...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Where's the beef?
While the utility and other industries that rely on SCADA/PCS infrastructures are woefully far behind on secure architecture and implementations, this article says nothing new. Do you have a link to some research paper that the analyst wrote? I'm more interested in details than another FUD campaign.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward 13 Jul 2007