28 Jul 2009
Ofcom has released research showing that UK broadband customers receive speeds that are significantly slower than those advertised by providers.
The average speed advertised by broadband providers is 7.1Mbit/s, but the telecoms regulator revealed in the UK Broadband Speeds 2009 Research Report (PDF) that the actual average in April this year was 4.1Mbit/s.
Ofcom's research follows the Digital Britain (PDF) report, which includes plans to achieve broadband access speeds of at least 2Mbit/s in all UK households by 2012. One in five UK homes currently receives less than 2Mbit/s, according to the Ofcom report.
However, Chris Marling, editor of broadband comparison site Broadband Genie, claimed that the situation is even worse than the Ofcom report suggests.
"People may be disappointed to see an average real broadband speed of less than half the 'up to' speed advertised by their ISP, but in truth what the consumer experiences is even worse," he said.
Marling pointed out that the Ofcom tests do not take into account further slowdowns from Wi-Fi connections and PC issues.
"Comparing the Ofcom results to our own, we estimate that the actual speed customers get to work with is often between 50 and 75 per cent of that quoted here, which could be 1Mbit/s to 2Mbit/s slower," he added.
Until the Ofcom report, there has been little information on the actual speeds delivered by ISPs, even though the measurement is increasingly important as internet users download more video and audio.
To test the speeds of different broadband providers the government monitored equipment in over 1,600 UK homes for six months, running 60 million tests by the end of April 2009.
The sample was said to be representative of UK broadband users as a whole, and allowed a comparison between the UK's nine largest broadband providers: AOL, BT, O2, Orange, Plusnet, Sky, Talk Talk, Virgin Media and Tiscali.
Virgin Media offered the highest broadband speed of 8.1Mbit/s to 8.7Mbit/s, while Tiscali gave consumers the poorest deal with an average of 3.2Mbit/s to 3.7Mbit/s.
Ofcom explained that the slower than advertised speeds were often due to DSL broadband slowing as users get further away from the exchange.
The research also showed that those living in urban areas received average broadband speeds of 4.6Mbit/s, significantly faster than those in rural areas who had an average of 3.3Mbit/s.
Additionally, cable broadband providers and DSL providers experienced slower broadband speeds during peak times because of capacity issues, Ofcom said. For example, speeds were 20 per cent slower during the hours of 8pm to 10pm than during the rest of the day.
The government said that it hopes the report will give operators more incentives to compete on performance, and invest in new technologies and capacities that provide consumers with faster broadband services.
In December 2008, a voluntary Code of Practice on Broadband Speeds encouraged ISPs to tell customers the maximum speed they can expect from their services and why actual speeds can differ from headline speeds.
Latest stories from Communications
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client a leading company in the education and qualification...
Incident Manager - Investment banking Fantastic opportunity...
Senior Product Manager - Broadband Zen Internet...
Senior C# Developer - Reigate: £60,000 to £80,000 + benefits...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
LIABILITIES
Surely 'The Trading Standards Office' should be involved in this ? Customers are clearly not getting what they are paying for, and the ISPs are raking in cash illegally!
Posted by: A. Webster 30 Jul 2009
Ofcom should be slammed over misleading league tables
I work for an ISP. How is it they are comparing fibre and copper line providers in the same table? All copper line providers have to use BT lines and therefore it is purley luck of the draw as to which customers ISP's get. If they get a customer 6 miles away from the exchange then it doesn't matter who provides the service as the BT line length is too long to give a good speed. If an ISP provide only to customers under a mile away from the exchange then they will instantly become the best ISP for speed. Virgin has it's fibre and that isn't available in many areas. For the rest of us, we will have to wait for 21C to be implimented by BT.
Posted by: Deakster 30 Jul 2009
Finding a reliable and honest ISP .. mission impossible ?
I've just been forced by Tiscali to go to another ISP, after ten years with them through the exchange in Bagshot, Surrey, I was left in a situation 2 months ago of a lot of lost packets, enough to make VoIP and audio streaming unusable. For 6 weeks they messed me around, with speed tests running between 512kbs ( deliberately throttled back ) and 6 mbs. They could not however fix my problem, just quoting all the time they "don't support VoIP services". I switched to BT just over a week ago .. this has become a fiasco too, with speed last night running at about 1.3Mbs, and the way they charged me for there "expensive" option 3, to the wrong phone bill insisting the ADSL was on that other number, charging me £129 instead of £9 for a 3G dongle, and had to fight to get my £40 "bribe" for switching from Tiscali .. stuff of nightmares. 36 hours later the online phone bills for my two lines still aren't corrected .. where's my Prozac !!
Posted by: Sarah Gosling. ( Station Engineer Smooth Radio London ) 29 Jul 2009
Rural Speed Fallacy
I have just invested in a "Nano-cell" because our Phones have such poor reception in Balsham, Cambridgeshire; silicone fen, well thats a joke. The Nano-cell doesnt work, why, because our "upto 7G" broadbant can not even reach the required 1G............Where is this rural broadband that the Gov. & BT boast about?
Posted by: Will Burton 29 Jul 2009
2 points
First point, OFCOM should not penalise ISP's for speed issues caused by either customers WIFI or PC problems it is down to the customer to make sure their equipment is up to standard when connecting to the inernet. Secondly i must be very very lucky living in devon, the first time i paid for an 8meg connection i got 7, when i moved and went to cable i paid for 2 and got 2 dead on, i then moved yet again and paid cable for 20meg, i now get 18.5.
Posted by: Carlos 28 Jul 2009