04 Jul 2008
New fibre-optic broadband connections have exceeded those of cable for the first time, according to research from Point Topic.
Over 4.2 million fibre-optic broadband subscribers were added worldwide in the first three months of 2008, compared to 2.5 million cable connections.
"This is a significant milestone for fibre-optic broadband. Where it is available consumers will take fibre over other broadband technologies," said Oliver Johnson, chief executive at Point Topic.
Some had expressed doubts that consumers would find the additional speed necessary or attractive, but the evidence suggests that users crave the extra bandwidth.
However, it seems that value for money, rather than pure speed, is the driving force behind the switch to fibre-optic.
"If you look at the cost per megabit per month, DSL comes in at around an average $20. Cable does better at roughly $12, but they are both eclipsed by fibre which can get as low as 50 cents," said Johnson.
There are sizeable variations depending on country, region and operator, but a rule of thumb is that DSL can cost 15 times as much as fibre for one megabit of bandwidth, and cable is seven times as expensive.
Point Topic found that the growth in fibre numbers is being driven by China, Japan and South Korea, where cable and DSL are losing subscribers to fibre technologies.
Although interest is high in the US, UK, France and Germany, low availability is equating to low adoption.
"There are problems in the deregulated markets when it comes to major infrastructure investment. Fibre deployment is expensive and in the US and Europe there are significant regulatory hurdles to overcome," said Johnson.
The analyst explained that it is difficult to persuade operators to make the necessary commitment when they cannot guarantee a return.
"In most Western markets regulators frown on monopolies and it is very difficult to sanction government expenditure given the self-imposed legal frameworks," he said.
"Without some form of centralised funding, however, it will be a long time before consumers in these markets get access to cheaper bandwidth."
Latest stories from Communications
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
TFL director of Games transport Mark Evers discusses how the public transport network is preparing for this summer's event
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
A client, a major financial services organisation, is...
Sharepoint Administrator, Sharepoint 2010, Sharepoint...
Proteus Europe, operating as an employment business...
Salesforce.com Senior Consultants and Leads Salesforce...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
fibre v cable
I thought I knew most of the techie stuff. But I thought cable was fiber optic. I don't understand the difference. There's room for some explaining here I'd say.
Posted by: Teery B 05 Jul 2008
New fibre optic connections
This should be a priority for both central and local government and private investors in Britain. Most users of broad band would quickly switch to fibre optic even if it was slightly more expensive, leaving cable and phone line suppliers with obsolete equipment and service. I know I would switch to fibre optic if I could. Every new development should have fibre optic as standard such with water, sewage disposal and electricity and gas.
Posted by: Philip Evans 05 Jul 2008