15 Mar 2009
For every way that the web has improved our lives (see the Top 10 best things about the web), it has also made things more complicated, frustrating and dangerous.
One can't uninvent technological breakthroughs, nor should one. Fire has been tremendously useful to humanity over the millennia, but tell that to the the victims of an arsonist. Cars have freed us from the tyranny of distance (and saved certain regions from terminal inbreeding) but still kill hundreds of thousands each year.
So having gone over the best that the web has brought, let's now take a look at some of the worst things from the web.
10.
Over commercialisation
Shaun Nichols: At times, navigating the web can be a lot like
walking through a giant bazaar of overenthusiastic street vendors and desperate
used car salesmen.
While life in big cities such as London and San Francisco isn't exactly short of ad placements, it pales in comparison to the barrage of banner ads and pop-ups that accompany some sites.
Imagine walking down the street, and every time you pass a store front, someone jumps out and waves a flyer in your face or waves around an airline ticket or just leaps in your face and screams "You may have colon cancer and not even know it!"
In the book Spook Country, William Gibson wrote about a character who was so tired of advertisements that the mere sight of a company logo or trademark made her physically ill. I know the feeling; some times my trusty AdBlock tool is about the only thing keeping my lunch down.
Part of this is just economics: when you're giving content away for free, you have to make revenues other ways, usually through ads. While I have no problem with site hosts and content providers trying to make a living off their work, the whole process becomes very, very tiring sometimes.
Iain Thomson: Marc Andreessen once told me that Tim Berners-Lee called him up when he was developing the browser and gave him an earful for including the ability to include pictures on the internet. After my daily bombardment of adverts I can begin to see his point.
Few things on the web are as annoying as adverts, and we've all got our pet hates. Personally it's the adverts that play video at deafening volume as soon as they load, which in the past has led to a mouthful of tea going over a keyboard in surprise.
While there are now thankfully plug-ins to extract most advertisements from browsers, the ad boys and girls are constantly on the look-out for new ways to bypass them. Their argument is that they are just obeying clients' orders and opening up opportunities that readers may not have known about. Personally I call this the Yuppie Nuremberg defence: "I vas only paying zee mortgage."
Shaun quotes Gibson, so I shall return the favour and point to Neil Stephenson. A quick trawl through Snow Crash and The Diamond Age will show you very plausible examples of where this is going. As technology improves and we carry more and more technology that can identify us, advertising is going to become more intrusive, and increasingly sophisticated and personalised.
He also raises a very good point, however. Advertising pays the bills for most online content and, as people are still unwilling to pay for it themselves, the adverts are keeping the whole web running semi-profitably. It would be a poorer, smaller web if it wasn't for the adverts. I just wish advertising executives would learn the value of the rapier over the cudgel.
9.
Overexposure
Shaun Nichols: Twitter, Facebook, Yelp, MySpace, LinkedIn,
YouTube. We have become a society that is rapidly losing any sort of
comprehension of the term 'too much information'.
The obsession with social networking and sharing has created a class of people whose sole desire is to become broadcast all over the web, a group some online gossip sites have termed 'fameballs'. When Jim Carey made The Truman Show 10 years ago, the idea of broadcasting a person's entire life was scary and surreal; these days it has its own term: 'lifecasting'.
It's ironic that people get so paranoid about the government tracking people through RFID and CCTV devices. Heck, half the population is already pretty much begging others to track them online.
Iain Thomson: In some ways the services Shaun mentions are an irritant, but they can serve a useful purpose. Last Christmas I was due to attend a party and found it had been cancelled. My partner Tweeted the news and we all got together anyway in another venue.
But this is a rare case. It's a sad but inescapable fact that most people's lives are just too dull to be worth all of the broadcasting going on. Do I care that a friend of a friend has just had a great cup of tea? Not in a million years, and I wish he'd just shut up about it.
But I think we're going to be facing something of a backlash against this sort of thing. Social networking sites in particular seem to come in and out of fashion on a two- or three-year cycle. MySpace is losing ground now but who remembers its predecessor Friendster? Facebook is proving more popular, but I think these things have their half life.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client a leading company in the education and qualification...
Incident Manager - Investment banking Fantastic opportunity...
Senior Product Manager - Broadband Zen Internet...
Senior C# Developer - Reigate: £60,000 to £80,000 + benefits...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Fraud, Viruses, etc.
What's needed are some fundamental redesigns. My suggestions: 1. Make the O/S and software physically separate from the working memory. Read-Only. Not what we jokingly call ROM, but physically impossible to send anything from the working memory to the O/S. One way traffic only. And make it physically impossible for anything in the safe storage to execute. Make it purely static storage. When you turn your 'puter on, you download a copy of the O/S and software, do your thing, then when you turn your computer OFF (a neglected security measure) it erases. So you upload a virus. So what? It may do stuff while you're on, but it doesn't get into the safe storage. This will make updating the software harder, but most updates are security patches any how. 2. A very large number of exploits attack buffers, and are possible because the software was written in a C language which doesn't monitor for overflows. So ban the interstate shipment of software developed in those languages. Modify C and C++ to provide the right protection, give them new names, and everybody has to go back and re-write the code. We'll make their lives easier. The new versions can run the old source code, but will spit out error messages every time they spot a failure to provide overflow protection. Why is there never time to do it right, but always time to do it over? 3. As one paper recently put it, complexity is the enemy of security. Most software is far into the Jabba the Hutt bloated decadence phase.
Posted by: Steve D 28 Mar 2009
Ads?
I don't see any ads, obviously you need to upgrade your ad-block plug-ins.
Posted by: stephend 17 Mar 2009
Instant experts ....
To use the phrase 'useful evolutionary purpose' just shows that you have either a) Never read any of Dawkin's books, or b) Have failed to understand them. Fie on your teleology! So my vote would be for people hijacking and then misusing words like 'meme' without any idea of and even less concern for what they actually mean. Tut.
Posted by: Ashley 17 Mar 2009
Hypocrisy
I count 8 advertisements on this page alone...sorry but complaining about too many ads when your site is inundated with them is, to be blunt, hypocritical.
Posted by: Diogenes 16 Mar 2009
The Web always had pictures
...before Mosaic, Netscape etc: http://info.cern.ch/NextBrowser.html AFAIK the only debate was about inline vs external images, and the exact markup language for linking to them...
Posted by: Dan Brickley 15 Mar 2009