All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Banks warned of pitfalls of ebanking

by Lisa Kelly

11 Jan 2000

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

IT directors of retail banks are being advised to keep in mind four priorities when considering computer development, says a report by TCA Consulting.

These priorities include architectural vision to avoid costly short-term investment decisions, evolution of systems as opposed to revolution, choosing the right middleware system and using a modern language such as XML to interface between different systems.

Richard Watrasiewicz, managing consultant in the retail banking practice at TCA, stated in the Retail Banking Package Market report that the latest applications are not the route to operational efficiency. Rather, it is being assessed "how these fit into the mid-to-long-term view of the IT infrastructure of the bank," he said.

On deciding which architectural approach to choose for Internet banking, Watrasiewicz added: "Very few look to the future. Internet banking is hard to do and many just bolt it on to their existing infrastructure."

Out of the two architectural approaches adopted by banks towards Internet banking, Watrasiewicz believes that making the Internet banking arm a standalone operation separate from the bank is preferable to keeping it inhouse.

Halifax, which is launching a direct bank, dubbed Greenfield.co, over the Internet and telephone in May is on the right track, according to Watrasiewicz: "It will be free from any shackles."

This is compared with Barclays, which has kept its Internet banking arm inhouse: "It claims to have the most Internet customers but it is not radical in what it offers," he said.

He also said the cost base is necessarily higher than banks opting for the standalone approach.

Peter Duffy, head of online banking at Barclays, disagrees with Watrasiewicz. "Our strategy is one of integration. Customers have more choice. They can access their accounts normally, come into branches or use the Internet," he said.

On the question of higher costs leading to lower rates of interest, Duffy said: "Customers will allow for some trade-off in favour of better service."

Greenfield.co is spending £100 million on its own systems using 200 developers, considerably lower than the £250 million investment startup for Egg.

Jim Spowart, chief executive of Greenfield.co, said the company's advantage would be "not having to inherit systems. If we do anything new, we don't have to look over our shoulder and can get the right systems for the right job."

Duffy maintained that Barclays' approach offers greater rewards: "We have built our current account and savings systems and are not starting from scratch. We can provide people with a deep level of functionality."

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

32%

1%

10%

57%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Riso

Colour printing: why the bill keeps outstripping the budget

The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts

Qlikview

Magic quadrant for business intelligence platforms

Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?

Grad BI Consultant

Implementation Consultant - Business Intelligence Software...

SQL Server DBA, ETL, SSIS, Financial

SQL Server DBA, ETL, SSIS, Datawarehousing, Financial...

Senior DB2 DBA

Job description *Customer facing: should be able to...

PHP / MySQL / Zend Framework Developer - Chelmsford

PHP / MySQL / Zend Framework Developer - Chelmsford...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.