18 Feb 2009
A Pennsylvania couple who claimed that their privacy had been violated by Google's Street View mapping service have failed to win compensation through the US courts.
Street View, which offers 360-degree street level images, will be released in the UK this spring. The service was launched in the US in 2007, and is generated by Google drivers who film the roads using car-mounted cameras.
Aaron and Christina Boring sued Google for trespass and invasion of privacy last year. The Street View cars are meant to capture images only from public roads, but took pictures of the Boring's drive which was marked with 'Private Road' and 'No Trespassing' signs.
The Borings claimed emotional suffering, and said that the pictures had caused their home to diminish in value by $25,000 (£17,000). But the US court ruled in Google's favour.
"The amended complaint is devoid of facts sufficient to indicate that the photographs of the Borings' property revealed private facts such that a reasonable person would be highly offended," said the case filing.
"It does not appear that the viability of street search has been compromised by requests that images be removed, nor does a search of relevant legal terms show that courts are inundated with - or even frequently consider - privacy claims based on virtual mapping."
UK privacy experts have raised concerns about Google launching the mapping service across the Atlantic, but the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has discussed the system with Google and is satisfied that it does not breach the Data Protection Act.
After talks with Google the ICO found that "Google is keen to capture images of streets and not individuals". Google has promised to blur number plates and faces to protect privacy.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
PHP Software Developers/Programmers- Automated Trading...
1st Level Application Support required to join a leading...
Helpdesk adviser required for a major organisation in...
.NET Developer is needed for a financial services...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
They should be forbidden
When I took photos of some buildings in my street last year before the complete street was rebuilt, immediatly a man walked up to me asking me why I take pictures from other people houses. Ppl are concerned when others take pics of their homes, but Google takes billions of pics and nobody really seems to care WHY they do it. They should have to ask everyone living in the street if they are allowed to take pics. It is a difference if one walks or drives down a street ONCE, or if you can scan complete villages for inviting homes from your desk.
Posted by: Thomas 15 Mar 2010