03 Nov 2009
The largest technology trade organisation in the US has written to president Obama urging the quick appointment of a government cyber security co-ordinator.
TechAmerica said in the open letter (PDF) that it has been five months since Obama's speech in May when he announced that he would appoint a government co-ordinator for online security as part of his national IT security plan.
"The urgency for progress in cyber security remains, and so does the need for the appointment of a qualified, credible, senior-level official to the cyber security co-ordinator post," wrote Phillip J. Bond, president of TechAmerica.
The proposed role would involve matching the security of the US critical infrastructure, around 80 per cent of which is run by private companies, implementing new standards, and co-ordinating with security organisations around the world.
While the Obama administration has approved spending on IT security, and backed the National Cybersecurity Awareness Month campaign in October, the letter is a clear indication of unrest in the technology industry at the delay.
"We observe that those that would seek to harm America by exploiting our digital infrastructure continue to increase their efforts," said the letter.
"That is why we believe that establishing cyber security co-ordination at this point will have a galvanising effect that would boost and focus the many federal efforts to combat cyber threats."
TechAmerica represents over 1,500 of the biggest technology companies in the US, and claims to be the largest technology advocacy group in the country. It has been mostly supportive of Obama, and the open letter is unusual.
The letter singled out Christopher Painter, deputy chief of the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the Department of Justice, for particular praise in the work done so far.
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Contract Systems Administrator, Southampton My...
PHP Web Developer required to join my market-leading...
Java Developer x2, Spring, Hibernate, Swindon, £40K...
As part of a major implementation of a new inventory...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Teach Obama how to count for himself and fix all of it by hand.
More important, someone needs to teach Obama how to count and verify system integrity by hand himself, teaching with him the entire population and industry of exploit. There is no excuse for these situations to exist in the first place. The unstable DHS has neither the compentancies nor the authority to provide OVERSIGHT for cyber-security issues, their job is concentrated on physical infrastructure and is unrelated to the diverse commerce and institutional systems which must be covered by a true authority not a brokering overpriced entity and must be capable of handling the real issues such as the Department of Commerce?s direct sponsorship of exploit through patents and FCC policy, factors which are simply not within the realm of DHS nor will be. Military topics are unrelated to civilian infrastructure in the USA. DHS is simply not qualified for oversight, no less any other antics.
Posted by: lee 03 Nov 2009