13 Sep 2006
Microsoft has released a trio of security fixes that cover five vulnerabilities in Windows as part of its monthly patch release.
Two of the patches address vulnerabilities that could allow remote code execution, allowing attackers to take control of a system.
These involve vulnerabilities in Windows XP and Windows 2000 SP4. Microsoft gave one a security rating of 'important' and the other as 'moderate'.
The 'important' vulnerability affects the Microsoft Message Queuing Service (MMQS) which is part of the Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM).
Although it could allow an attacker to take control of a system the MMQS is not installed by default, Microsoft said in a security bulletin.
The third vulnerability affects Microsoft Publisher 2000, 2002 and 2003.
Security firm McAfee warned that the 'important' Windows vulnerability is of most concern to end users.
"Of the three announced today, the PGM vulnerability stands out because it can be remotely exploited without user interaction," said Monty Ijzerman, senior manager at McAfee's Global Threat Group.
Microsoft and McAfee urged users to download and install the patches.
Microsoft
Security Bulletin MS06-052
Microsoft
Security Bulletin MS06-053
Microsoft
Security Bulletin MS06-054
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
Graduate Developer / Software Developer (.Net, VB.Net...
PHP Developer / Web Developer (PHP4/5, Object Orientated...
Web Games Designer – Gibraltar Web Games Designer...
An exciting opportunity for a Systems / Business Analyst...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?