14 Jun 2007
Giants from the world of technology have joined forces with global environmental groups to form the Climate Savers Computing Initiative (CSCI).
Intel, Google, Dell, HP, IBM and Microsoft will work with the Environmental Protection Agency, The World Wildlife Fund and more than a dozen other organisations to tackle global warming.
The goal of the broad-based environmental effort is to save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by setting aggressive new targets for energy-efficient computers and components.
"The average desktop PC today wastes nearly half of its power, and the average server wastes one-third of its power," said Urs Holzle, senior vice president of operations at Google.
"The CSCI is setting a new 90 per cent efficiency target for power supplies which, if achieved, will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 54 million tons per year and save more than $5.5bn in energy costs."
The initiative is unique as it combines the demand and supply side of the computer industry, as well as environmental groups, energy companies, retailers and government agencies.
"We are asking businesses and individuals throughout the world to join with us to institute better power management of their computing equipment and to purchase energy-efficient computers," said Holzle.
The companies involved in the initiative will commit to building energy-efficient products that meet or surpass the EPA's Energy Star guidelines.
Businesses must also commit to requiring high efficiency systems for the majority of their corporate desktop PCs and volume server purchases, and to deploy and use power management tools on desktop PCs.
The CSCI energy efficiency benchmarks will initially follow the EPA's Energy Star guidelines; but with increasing requirements during the next few years.
For example, 2007 Energy Star specifications require that PC power supplies meet at least 80 per cent minimum efficiency whereas the new initiative would require a minimum of 90 per cent efficiency by 2010.
The CSCI also sets a higher efficiency target in the power supply for volume servers (1U and 2U single-socket and dual-socket systems) from 85 per cent to 92 per cent efficiency by 2010.
"By 2010, the CSCI will cut greenhouse gas emissions in an amount equal to removing more than 11 million cars from the road or shutting down 20 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants, a significant step in reducing the emissions affecting our planet," said Pat Gelsinger, senior vice president and general manager of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group.
Individual consumers can also support the CSCI by signing up at the website, where they can pledge to purchase an initiative-certified system.
The website will also help consumers learn how to take advantage of their existing computer's power-saving capabilities, such as sleep and hibernate modes, which can reduce the amount of energy consumed by up to 60 per cent.
Latest stories from Developer
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client is a well established, non profit organisation;...
PHP Web Developer – £30,000 - £35,000 PHP, MySQL, HTML...
HEAD OF DIGITAL - London - £80-95K + Excellent Bens...
Agile C# Developer - (North London) £55,000 - £65,000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
'Beantown' is a Green Town
"Today, the average desktop PC wastes nearly half of its power..." This is a serious problem, especially considering how many PCs are in use today. I'm glad to see that Google, Intel, and the rest of the Climate Savers Computing Initiative are beginning to do something about this. But some American cities, such as Boston, have already beat them to it. Thanks to the recent efforts of Boston's current administration, Boston is now on the cutting edge of environmentally-friendly technology, setting a national example for early adoption of bold new environmental trends. Most recently, in February of 2007, the city installed Verdiem's surveyor software on all PCs at Boston City Hill, and it has already reduced PC energy use by an average of 44 per cent. It is saving an average of 180 kWh of electricity or about $25 per PC annually through centrally managing the sleep, shut down and wake cycles. Essentially, this program simply places the PCs into lower power settings when they're not in use, like when you go to lunch, a meeting or even home for the evening. Based on its existing customer base, annual use of Verdiem technology reduces greenhouse gas emissions at a rate equal to taking more than 8,000 passenger cars off the road for an entire year, or conserving 4,317,988 gallons of gasoline. Bill Oates, Boston's CIO, said the software only cost the city $25 for each PC licence, and based on projections, it will save the city $25 per PC annually. 'So we believe that after the first year we will have covered the cost of the licence,' Oates said. After that, 'we'll save about $30,000 annually.'
Posted by: Kat 20 Jul 2007
It's Just Economics
Going Green means saving money, it has nothing to do with the environment. My point in all of this is that CO2 does NOT cause climate change; I am not arguing that a change in the climate might be occurring. The climate on earth changes all the time and that global change is caused by the Sun (a new NASA finding). All life on the planet is carbon based, CO2 is part of our food chain, and it is not a pollutant. The biggest ?green house gas? is water vapor. If climate change is caused by human activity then we would need to start eliminating life on the planet, yes this is absurd, so is the assertion that humans are causing climate change. It just is NOT the truth. Additional information http://www.InteliOrg.com/co2_climate_change.html
Posted by: Dr Coles 14 Jun 2007