09 Feb 2007
Online video services such as YouTube and Joost are pushing internet capacity to breaking point, a top Google executive has warned.
Vincent Dureau, head of TV technology at Google, said that the web will soon struggle to meet rising demand for high-quality online video.
The search giant paid $1.65bn for YouTube last year.
Speaking at the Cable Europe Conference in Amsterdam this week, Dureau said: "The web infrastructure, even Google's [infrastructure], does not scale. It is not going to offer the quality of service that consumers expect."
Google is already investing heavily just to keep data flowing, according to Dureau.
Meanwhile, a report from analysts at Deloitte predicts that 2007 may see the internet approach capacity.
The Predictions 2007 report cites increased demand for online video, but also blames social networking sites like MySpace and Bebo for " pushing bandwidth to breaking point".
A fast-growing appetite for online video is borne out by the numbers. On Tuesday more than a million people watched The Sun's online clip of a 'friendly fire' incident in Iraq, and viewing figures of up to 100 million have been linked to Loose Change, a controversial online documentary about 9/11.
UK technology researcher CacheLogic claimed that 60 per cent of the internet's peer-to-peer traffic is now video, and that the average file size is 1GB.
Online video service bosses are confident that the internet can handle the demands. Fredrik de Wahl, of recently-launched web TV portal Joost, suggested that infrastructure providers have made great strides to expand network capacity.
US infrastructure provider VeriSign, for example, is investing $100m (£51m) over the next three years to increase bandwidth by a factor of 10.
European network firm Interoute has spent €22m (£14.6m) upgrading its network to cope with demand for online high-definition video.
Tim Sparke, chief executive at Loose Change distributor Mercury Media, told vnunet.com that market forces would help solve any difficulties.
"If space needs to be rationed, then it will be rationed on price," he said. "If at peak time consumers have to pay more to access material through their ISP, they will end up downloading content outside peak times."
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Position: Infrastructure Technical Lead Experience...
Channel Manager / Sales Manager /Software solutions...
BUSINESS SALES / IT SALES / BUSINESS CONSULTANT / LONDON...
TECHNICAL SALES / ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE / SOFTWARE SALES...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
And if..
"The Predictions 2007 report cites increased demand for online video, but also blames social networking sites like MySpace and Bebo for " pushing bandwidth to breaking point"." And if MySpace were a cornerstone of bandwidth technology, this statement would mean something.
Posted by: Ross A. 10 Feb 2007
simple multicast your content
its your own fault, the ISPs have had multicasting capability since the day dot and they continue to refuse to turn on and build up this capability directly to the end users. the fact is if there were a mass re-enablement of the isp and related infrastructure routers to finally enable end users to use direct multicasting options that are in every single ip stack then you would finally see the likes of torrent traffic actively switch to UDP multicasting,and infact bring the old so called Mbone network into 2007 by a simple addition of adding P2P and DHT into the torrent spec. in so doing , you create an almost instant mass saving of grobal bandwidth as each unicast can then be receaved by countless receavers over multicast and tunnels if needs be to begin with. thats what iv been advocating for years, switch the multicasting on, and help the likes of the free java codebase azurius torrent app to start using multcasting. you could gomany ways with multicasting options but to begin with it might be wise to adopt a near realtime send as that makes and gives the best chance of optimising the P2P/DHT part of the new combined protocol. the simple truth for the likes of UK based Virgin Media(NTL:tw)is to switch on multicasting to their vast UK coverage of users and put in place end user messageboards to take realtime feedback as you adapt and modify your WAN/MAN etc and grow that multicasting link to all the other world class caryers etc. dont come back and say the old school argument we need to wait for ipv6, not you dont , it works just fine for saving massive bandwidth over ipv4 as well , tunnel it if you must BUT DO IT, and do it NOW.....
Posted by: popper 09 Feb 2007