All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis
|
|
|
27 Nov 2009
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopaedia that anyone can edit, has countered claims that it is losing participants, but has admitted that it needs to do more to attract contributors.
Wikipedia is the fifth most popular web property in the world, logging 344 million unique visitors last month, according to figures from comScore Media Metrix.
However, a report in The Wall Street Journal this week claimed that the site is losing huge numbers of the 'editors' who write the topic entries.
The report said that Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors in the first three months of 2009, a full 10 times as many as it did in the first three months of 2008, when it lost 4,900 editors.
The newspaper then went on to speculate about the reasons for the wholesale desertions, suggesting that editors often feel exasperated when asked to debate the content of articles time and time again.
However, Wikipedia has claimed that the numbers quoted in the report are not accurate because they are taken from research that measures when an individual Wikipedia editor starts editing and when they stop.
"It is impossible to make a determination that a person has left and will never edit again. There are methodological challenges with determining the long-term trend of joining and leaving," said the company in a blog post.
"Studying the number of actual participants in a given month shows that Wikipedia participation as a whole has declined slightly from its peak two and a half years ago, and has remained stable since then.
"The number of articles in Wikipedia keeps growing. There are about 14.4 million articles in Wikipedia, with thousands of new ones added every day."
The company explained that it now has a "usability initiative", which aims to make it easier to contribute to Wikipedia and its sister projects by improving the underlying open-source technology, and an "outreach initiative" that will help recruit new volunteers.
"Removing barriers is key to recruiting new editors," Wikipedia said.
Latest stories from Web
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Oracle E-Business Analyst / Functional Consultant - Supply...
SAP consultant Production: SAP MM, IM, PP, APO, Brussels...
Full time DBA with 5-10 years experience will be preffered...
Software Development Manager - Scottish Borders Agile...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Wiki editors are hacks
The larger story is that Wikipedia editors, in the vast majority of cases, are hacks who don't know what they're doing. Any fool can become a Wiki editor, as evidenced by the Wiki editorial product. If tens of thousands of Wiki's current batch of fools jump ship, there are plenty of other fools in this world to take their place.
Posted by: H Campbell 29 Nov 2009
Mediocredia
I've quit as an editor because I was tired seeing "admins" promoting their own ideas as "correct" without any scientific proof, admins bullying members that have an opposite opinion and sometimes promoting themselves or their business through the "project". Wikipedia expresses our mediocre times in all their glory. I'm convinced that's the only reason so many people still find it "good".
Posted by: o.j. 27 Nov 2009