17 Jul 2008
Microsoft has approached Congress over what it claims are antitrust concerns regarding Yahoo's advertising deal with Google.
Brad Smith, general counsel at Microsoft, told a congressional hearing on 15 July that the proposed search advertising deal could harm the market and hinder innovation.
"Never before in the history of advertising has one company been in the position to control prices on up to 90 per cent of advertising in a single medium," he said.
"If search is the gateway to the internet, and most believe that it is, this deal will put Google in a position to own that gateway and the information that flows through it."
Yahoo struck the deal with Google earlier this year as it tried to fend off a takeover bid from Microsoft.
Yahoo estimated that it could generate some $800m in revenue by displaying Google ads in its search results.
But Smith contends that the deal will also allow Google a free rein to raise the prices it charges advertisers.
"When Yahoo talks about this deal generating up to $800m in additional revenue, that is money out of the pockets of American businesses, big and small, which will pay higher prices for the very same ads they buy from Yahoo today."
Microsoft also highlighted what it believes are privacy concerns. The company has publically warned of Google's reach in the advertising market since it acquired DoubleClick in 2007.
Smith reiterated that point on Tuesday, telling Congress that the deal would also give Google free rein over the user information shared with advertisers.
"If one company controls up to 90 per cent of online search advertising it will have a complete picture of your online activities," he said.
"If that happens, Congress will not need to enact a federal privacy policy. We will already have a national privacy policy - Google's privacy policy."
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Firm also discusses Blackberry 10 system
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Major Global Consultancy currently experiencing a period...
Contract Solutions Designer / Solutions Architect - Investment...
IT Consultant - Financial Services - up to £50'000...
Reference Data Pre-Sales - London - £50'000 - £80'000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Poor little Microsoft
Where was this argument when M$ was forcing PC manufacturers to pay for it's O/S even though some people didn't want it. What about locking selected developers out of the O/S if they didn't play ball the M$ way. This is just a big cry baby that couldn't force others to play their way for once. I hope it keeps happening to M$.
Posted by: All for Free Enterprise 24 Jul 2008
Better Google than Microsoft
Whilst I agree totally with the basis of Microsoft's claims there are other issues here than just the monopolisation. I find it hypocritical in the least that M$, the worst company in my history for screwing competitors by not just outpositioning a company by embedding a similar & usually inferior product but threatening other companies that by using the alternative software they will reduce any financial incentives. Screw yourself M$. You've always been a bunch a mongrels. You don't have the right to criticise Google.
Posted by: Rex Alfie Lee 18 Jul 2008
Yahoo and Google feature sponsored ads for illegal drugs
Both Yahoo and Google feature sponsored ads for poppers, the sale and distribution banned in US in 1991. The promotion of poppers is a public health challenge because of research showing that poppers use is associated with risky sex and HIV transmission. Both Yahoo and Google are already on notice about their illegal practices. MSN stopped the sponsored ads. In November 2007, Google, Yahoo, MSN agreed to a fine of nearly $30 million for featuring searches listing illegal gambling sites. The US Justice Department should raise this issue. Apparently, a lesson was not learned about featuring sites, in the case of sponsored ads profiting off of promoting the illegal drug sites.
Posted by: Hank Wilson 17 Jul 2008
e
google putting ads on yahoo website is just badass on google's part
Posted by: joel rivera 17 Jul 2008